Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mitigate keybind conflicts #36

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025
Merged

Conversation

RecursivePineapple
Copy link
Owner

This will prevent conflicting keybinds from activating when holding a manipulator. MM keybinds take priority over all others. While this will fix 99% of conflicts, some mods may use a lower-level mechanism for checking keypresses, which can't be intercepted without a much more invasive change.

This will prevent conflicting keybinds from activating when holding a
manipulator. MM keybinds take priority over all others. While this will
fix 99% of conflicts, some mods may use a lower-level mechanism for
checking keypresses, which can't be intercepted without a much more
invasive change.
@RecursivePineapple RecursivePineapple added bug Something isn't working enhancement Improves an existing feature labels Jan 24, 2025
@RecursivePineapple RecursivePineapple merged commit 2041cb2 into master Jan 24, 2025
1 check passed
@RecursivePineapple RecursivePineapple deleted the mitigate-keybind-conflicts branch January 24, 2025 22:27
RecursivePineapple added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2025
This will prevent conflicting keybinds from activating when holding a
manipulator. MM keybinds take priority over all others. While this will
fix 99% of conflicts, some mods may use a lower-level mechanism for
checking keypresses, which can't be intercepted without a much more
invasive change.

(cherry picked from commit 2041cb2)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement Improves an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant