Added a separate package BayesianNeuralPDE.jl #920
Conversation
|
The CI failed showing some python distutils error |
|
@ChrisRackauckas The BayesianNeuralPDE part has been split into a separate package. Do I also need to make respective changes in the docs ? because the current documentation tests would likely fail on the CI while the others pass |
|
The tests that failed are based on documentation. Should I make changes to that too?? |
| @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ IntervalSets = "8197267c-284f-5f27-9208-e0e47529a953" | |||
| LinearAlgebra = "37e2e46d-f89d-539d-b4ee-838fcccc9c8e" | |||
| LogDensityProblems = "6fdf6af0-433a-55f7-b3ed-c6c6e0b8df7c" | |||
| Lux = "b2108857-7c20-44ae-9111-449ecde12c47" | |||
| OrdinaryDiffEq = "1dea7af3-3e70-54e6-95c3-0bf5283fa5ed" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Because, when I precompiled NeuralPDE, it gave me an error saying this dependency is required for NeuralPDE but not found in its dependencies section
| @info "Running tests with $(RETESTITEMS_NWORKERS) workers and \ | ||
| $(RETESTITEMS_NWORKER_THREADS) threads for group $(GROUP)" | ||
|
|
||
| ReTestItems.runtests(NeuralPDE; tags = (GROUP == "all" ? nothing : [Symbol(GROUP)]), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't this be BayesainNeuralPDE? Also, this might not be tested at all in CI. Look at how its done in OrdinaryDiffEq or some other where there are subpackages.
Checklist
contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
COLPRAC.
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.