Add the possibility of to save the data with hostpath.

[jbazp]

Sonarqube will not have more than one instance at a time, I want it to always run on a node and within that node save the information with hostpath, I do not want PVC or PV, I want to directly access the host disk to save it and it will go very quickly , easy and without intermediaries (Storage Provider).

Please ensure your pull request adheres to the following guidelines:

• Document your Changes in the CHANGELOG.md file of the respected chart as well as the Chart.yaml

[davividal]

Hi @jbazp.

Thank you for your contribution. It looks like a cool improvement.

Could you please rebase your branch against the current master and provide a testing values.yaml under tests/unit-compatibility-test/sonarqube?

EDIT: when adding your testing values.yaml, make sure that you have pre-commit configured or run .cirrus/generate_helm_fixtures.sh manually.

Can you also replicate this to the sonarqube-dce chart?

[jbazp]

Hi @davividal! I made the changes you requested me, Can you check again?

[davividal]

How did you generate both tests/unit-compatibility-test/fixtures/sonarqube-dce/host-path-values.yaml and tests/unit-compatibility-test/fixtures/sonarqube/host-path-values.yaml?

They look like a copy of tests/dynamic-compatibility-test/sonarqube-dce/all-values.yaml and tests/dynamic-compatibility-test/sonarqube/all-values.yaml.
Did you run the .cirrus/generate_helm_fixtures.sh script?

[jbazp]

Yes!

First, I created the values.yaml files:

• tests/unit-compatibility-test/sonarqube/host-path-values.yaml]
• tests/unit-compatibility-test/sonarqube-dce/host-path-values.yaml

And finally, I ran .cirrus/generate_helm_fixtures.sh locally and it genereted me the following files:

• tests/unit-compatibility-test/fixtures/sonarqube/host-path-values.yaml
• tests/unit-compatibility-test/fixtures/sonarqube-dce/host-path-values.yaml

[jbazp]

Hi @davividal! Do you need anything else?

[davividal]

One last fix before I can merge this. :)

[davividal]

@jbazp can you rebase from master, please?

[jbazp]

@davividal I did the rebase.

[jbazp]

Hi @davividal ! Can you merge the PR? Otherwise I have to do rebase constantly.

[jbazp]

Hi @davividal! The PR is ready for to merge.

[davividal]

Thanks for this cool improvement, @jbazp!

I duplicated your PR on #631 so we can run our pipeline on your branch. Your fixture test case needs one minor fix, but I can do it.

[jbazp]

Great @davividal! If there's anything I can help you with, just let me know.