Add Draft "Choice of identity" Decision Record #144
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joshua Mühlfort <[email protected]>
|
Is this still relevant? I will close this PR if nothing happens by July 31st. |
|
As commented in #140, it's still generally relevant. But: The decision what type of identity (document) should be used, may be more tilted towards OIDC style tokens, currently. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While having not worked extensively with any of the mentioned options yet (and possibly misunderstanding some details), I tried to give a brief assessment of possible options for machine (and human) identities which could be used in a generic manner to authenticate against cloud services.
This document must not be merged before #140 is accepted as SCS consensus decision. Until then, its purpose is to share my thoughts about this topic, enabling future discussions.