Blog article on joint SCS standardization w/ ALASCA. #790
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Kurt Garloff <[email protected]>
garloff
requested review from
mbuechse,
maxwolfs,
alexander-diab and
FriederikeZelke
garloff
added
Community
|
Should we move this from the Blog section into the Own announcements section? |
Signed-off-by: Kurt Garloff <[email protected]>
|
Ignore this, we have PR #789 which I overlooked. |
| langfristige Kontinuität der SCS-Standardisierungsaktivitäten. Die Special | ||
| Interest Group ist offen für alle Cloud Provider und Integratoren, die | ||
| entsprechend SCS-konforme Angebote im Markt machen und zu den Standards | ||
| beitragen wollen. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This sounds potentially a little exclusive. It could be misundastood, that only firms, which already utilize the standards may join. Is this, what we aim for as participation criteria?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I depends on how you read the "und" -- IT folks may read it as boolean and where both conditions need to be fulfilled, people with less math background probably see it as inclusive. We are open to everyone that wants to contribute, though I think I would consider input from people that consume SCS standards or that provide services according to SCS standards a lot more relevant than arbitrary musings from people whose interest is unclear ...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Very well formulated. Two thoughts:
- Overall it sounds like there is collaboration and intended to be used on both sides. If the decision is finalized, it could be expressed stronger and clearer.
- For people like us, who are familiar with the topics, that text may be easy to consume. It may be considered to do a reality check with a person, which has less background.
| and coordintated by Dr. Matthias Büchse from Cloud & Heat technologies. | ||
| Building on top of already existing standards, the goal is to achieve a | ||
| broader adoption of SCS standards by more close collaboration with ALASCA | ||
| and also cover the ALASCA technology stack with the cloud lifecycle management |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| and also cover the ALASCA technology stack with the cloud lifecycle management | |
| and also cover the ALASCA technology stack with the cloud-lifecycle management |
(weil cloud sich auf lifecycle und nicht auf management tool bezieht)
|
I think this is a duplicate of #789. |
Once merged, the article will go live within ~10 minutes.
ToDo: