-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[TASK] Use assignMultiple() where appropriate #85
Conversation
Releases: main, 12.4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is the advantage in doing this? Isn't chaining just as valid? Is this an official recommendation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(Lina: It's less op-calls to perform, and IMO has less redundancy and is clearer to read)
Yup, my intention was better readability. |
The backport to
stderr
stdout
To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal: # Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-12.4 12.4
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-12.4
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport-85-to-12.4
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick 7f74d5f175d0cd6c262e2f00bc7fac2a89bc8572
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport-85-to-12.4
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-12.4 Then, create a pull request where the |
Releases: main, 12.4