Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use GT materials for dense ore decomposition. #1471

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: microminer_rework
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tomprince
Copy link
Contributor

Also adjust output amounts to account for original ore type.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@tomprince tomprince left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've had this sitting around for a couple of days, and think it makes more sense to use GT materials for the outputs, rather than needing to encode the mod from which the raw ore comes from.

.inputFluids(Fluid.of("gtceu:nitric_acid", 1000))
.duration(200)
.EUt(500)
})

event.recipes.gtceu.chemical_reactor("kubejs:undensify_oilsands")
.itemInputs("kubejs:dense_oilsands_ore")
.itemOutputs('16x gtceu:raw_oilsands')
.itemOutputs('16x gtceu:endstone_oilsands_ore')
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had left this untouched when I was doing the change, to allow the use of the centrifuging recipe for oilsand blocks. It allows using the miner trick for it, but oil is cheap enough that I don't think it maters.

Also adjust output amounts to account for original ore type.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant