-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump turing version 0.36 #22
Conversation
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I proposed a fix to the Gibbs constructor usage, otherwise this seems good to me.
By the way, it seems the Turing.Inference.getparams specializations are still necessary. Is there a reason why Turing currently go through AbstractMCMC.getparams?
There's no good reason. We should change to using AbstractMCMC.getparams
, but we just haven't gotten to it yet.
Co-authored-by: Markus Hauru <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Markus Hauru <[email protected]>
…ng.jl into bump_turing_v0.36
No description provided.