feat(devboard): Add support for ESP32 #39
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This fixes an obscure compilation error, where `min()` may attempt to resolve `const int` with `crsfProtocol::frameSize_e` on some platforms.
ZZ-Cat
added
✨️ Enhancement ✨️
…r Adafruit ESP32-S3 w/NO PSRAM I forgot to add this in my previous commit. =</.>=
…t Feather ESP32-S3 variants
ZZ-Cat
commented
Oct 18, 2023
… missing Teensy 3.x and Teensy 4.x boards
ZZ-Cat
removed
⤴️ Rebase Needed ⤴️
|
Right. This Pull Request is good to go. |
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
This Pull Request adds support for the ESP32 line of development boards.
Tasks
The following lists the development boards that are added to the Compatibility Table:
Plus many more, as time marches on.
Additional notes
Like I did with #37, this uses
Serial1by default. If need be, I may add support for more UART ports (wherever applicable) if requested.If someone requests it, I may add support for the ESP32 predecessor (ESP8285 and ESP8266), because I am aware that ExpressLRS themselves target ESP8285 based transmitters and receivers for their firmware (which automatically tells me that the CRSF Protocol is fully compatible with ESP8285 and ESP8266).