Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(hub-test): implemented DiscountedBalances unit test coverage #100

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 18, 2024

Conversation

roleengineer
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@roleengineer roleengineer changed the title (hub-test): implemented unit test coverage (hub-test): implemented DiscountedBalances unit test coverage Nov 18, 2024
@roleengineer
Copy link
Contributor Author

solving this #99

@benjaminbollen
Copy link
Member

congrats on 100th number 🥳

@roleengineer roleengineer self-assigned this Nov 18, 2024
Copy link
Member

@benjaminbollen benjaminbollen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks very good to me! We're officially started on this epic 🏇

return MAX_VALUE;
}

function getAvatarBalanceValue(uint256 id, address avatar) external view returns (uint192) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

on the candidate/stable branch we should look to make these struct readable, among others

@benjaminbollen benjaminbollen merged commit 653f1ed into beta Nov 18, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants