-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upd: Maintainers #565
Upd: Maintainers #565
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the Changes
Poem
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
MAINTAINERS.md (1)
3-12
: Well-structured maintainer documentationThe new table structure with scope definition provides better clarity about areas of responsibility. This organization will help both contributors and users better understand who to contact for specific aspects of the project.
Consider adding a brief description of what each scope entails, either as a separate section or as footnotes, to provide more context about the areas of responsibility.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
MAINTAINERS.md
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
MAINTAINERS.md (4)
3-4
: LGTM! Well-structured table headerThe table structure follows Markdown best practices with clear column headers.
5-6
: LGTM! Clear designation of core maintainersCore maintainers are well-documented with proper GitHub profile links.
11-11
: Verify company informationThe company field is empty for Timofey Larkin. Please verify if this is intentional or if it should be updated.
7-12
: LGTM! Well-organized maintainer responsibilitiesThe addition of specific scopes provides clear accountability and shows good distribution of responsibilities across the team. Having multiple maintainers for documentation and etcd-operator demonstrates good redundancy in critical areas.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Closed in favor #564 |
Summary by CodeRabbit