-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
destination-s3: Use airbyte/java-connector-base:1.0.0 #50960
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
destination-s3: Use airbyte/java-connector-base:1.0.0 #50960
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
@@ -2,12 +2,14 @@ data: | |||
connectorSubtype: file | |||
connectorType: destination | |||
definitionId: 4816b78f-1489-44c1-9060-4b19d5fa9362 | |||
dockerImageTag: 1.5.0-rc.4 | |||
dockerImageTag: 1.5.0-rc.5 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The version should be 1.5.1. And progressive rollout should be disabled. Unless you think there's risk to not rolling this out slowly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@johnny-schmidt I think we can indeed not use progressive rollout for this release. But your team should coordinate to make sure we don't merge this before 1.5.0
is out - as it'll otherwise stop the progressive rollout of 1.5.0-rc.4
. Wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually I think the right way to proceed here is just to let you merge this as rc.5, then I will just fail that rollout, and release rc.6 on top of you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually looks like rc.5 got in ahead of you, you'll need to bump to rc.6, I'll take care of rolling the release forward.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This can't be merged until the progressive rollout in progress is completed.
@alafanechere what's the level of risk here? What exactly is different about the test image. Have you verified that this works in cloud / do you need one of us to perform that test? |
@johnny-schmidt the risk is very low. A successful build is enough IMO to consider it stable. We just changed the build logic - from a base image on which we pre-bundle some system deps / entrypoint. But we did not change the system at all. We already shipped this change smoothly on other java connectors so I feel pretty confident. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of waiting for the current S3 release to complete, we will just add this to it by
- release this as rc.5
- i will fail rc.5
- release rc.6 with these changes included
Since I need to move the release forward, I'm going to go ahead and turn on automerge for this. |
@johnny-schmidt feel free to orchestrate the versioning and merge 👍 |
Make the connector use our official base image for java connectors