Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update anthropometric model data format #89

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

m-lancini
Copy link
Collaborator

As suggested in the previous comments the anthropometric data format now details how prepare also mass, inertia and other properties of each body segment.

As suggested in the previous comments the anthropometric data format now details how prepare also mass, inertia and other properties of each body segment.
[source]
----
segment_label:
Name: segment name including side prefix (string, equal to the segment label, can be omitted)
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would rather put all subkey in lower case, i.e name instead of Name

@@ -233,6 +233,40 @@ Use appropriate leading zeros for R and N to ensure proper ordering of files.

**File structure**: Set of lines containing key: value.
For anthropometric measures, the keys should be the ones presented in <<model.adoc#table_body_segment, body segment table>>.
Each body segment is characterized by its name, mass, length, center of mass and inertia matrix.
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would relax the sentence a bit, using can be characterized instead of is , so that we do not force all measurements to be provided.

@aremazeilles
Copy link
Owner

If you agree the 2 small adjustments I suggest, I can handle the adjustment and merge.
Other than that, I have no prb with this proposal. May I miss any case @alfonsotecnalia ?

@m-lancini
Copy link
Collaborator Author

m-lancini commented Apr 29, 2021 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants