Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[flake8-bugbear] Catch yield in subexpressions (B901) (#14453) #15254

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kaspell
Copy link

@kaspell kaspell commented Jan 4, 2025

Summary

Currently, the B901 rule misses yield expressions that are not top-of-tree in a function body, for example as in

def f():
	x = yield
	print(x)
	return 42

This commit refactors the rule to find such yield expressions. Assignments are traversed and identifiers bound to yield or yield from expressions are tracked, so that if a value bound to those identifiers is later returned (which is valid), the rule is not triggered.

The assignment traversal part is inspired by the match_value and match_target functions from src/analyze/typing.rs in the ruff_python_semantic crate.

Closes #14453.

Test Plan

cargo test. Didn't yet manage to get the ecosystem tests to run locally.

Currently, the B901 rule misses yield expressions that are not
top-of-tree in a function body, for example as in

	def f():
		x = yield
		print(x)
		return 42

This commit refactors the rule to find such yield expressions.
Assignments are traversed and identifiers bound to yield or
yield from expressions are tracked, so that if a value bound to
those identifiers is later returned (which is valid), the rule
is not triggered.

The assignment traversal part is inspired by the match_value and
match_target functions from src/analyze/typing.rs in the
ruff_python_semantic crate.

The relevant issue is astral-sh#14453.
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 4, 2025

ruff-ecosystem results

Linter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Linter (preview)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

@MichaReiser MichaReiser added rule Implementing or modifying a lint rule preview Related to preview mode features labels Jan 6, 2025
}

impl StatementVisitor<'_> for ReturnInGeneratorVisitor {
impl ast::statement_visitor::StatementVisitor<'_> for ReturnInGeneratorVisitor {
Copy link
Member

@MichaReiser MichaReiser Jan 6, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. I think we can simplify the implementation a fair bit by implementing Visitor instead of StatementVisitor. The difference is that Visitor visits expressionos by default so that you don't have to write that code yourself. This also guarantees that we find yield expressions in arbitary nested expressions.

I also took a quick look at the upstream bugbear implementation and it simply skips over ReturnStmts (it never walks them, it only sets in_return to true).

The patch would roughly be

Index: crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_bugbear/rules/return_in_generator.rs
IDEA additional info:
Subsystem: com.intellij.openapi.diff.impl.patch.CharsetEP
<+>UTF-8
===================================================================
diff --git a/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_bugbear/rules/return_in_generator.rs b/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_bugbear/rules/return_in_generator.rs
--- a/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_bugbear/rules/return_in_generator.rs	(revision 6ca384ae891a1f87b5429c2058e591a9d644d96b)
+++ b/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_bugbear/rules/return_in_generator.rs	(date 1736158520791)
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 use ruff_diagnostics::Diagnostic;
 use ruff_diagnostics::Violation;
 use ruff_macros::{derive_message_formats, ViolationMetadata};
-use ruff_python_ast::{self as ast, visitor::Visitor, Expr, Stmt};
+use ruff_python_ast::{self as ast, visitor, visitor::Visitor, Expr, Stmt};
 use ruff_text_size::TextRange;
 
 use crate::checkers::ast::Checker;
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
     }
 
     let mut visitor = ReturnInGeneratorVisitor::default();
-    ast::statement_visitor::StatementVisitor::visit_body(&mut visitor, &function_def.body);
+    visitor.visit_body(&function_def.body);
 
     if visitor.has_yield {
         if let Some(return_) = visitor.return_ {
@@ -117,146 +117,33 @@
 struct ReturnInGeneratorVisitor {
     return_: Option<TextRange>,
     has_yield: bool,
-    yield_expr_names: HashMap<String, BindState>,
-    yield_on_last_visit: bool,
 }
 
-impl ast::statement_visitor::StatementVisitor<'_> for ReturnInGeneratorVisitor {
+impl Visitor<'_> for ReturnInGeneratorVisitor {
     fn visit_stmt(&mut self, stmt: &Stmt) {
         match stmt {
-            Stmt::Expr(ast::StmtExpr { value, .. }) => match **value {
-                Expr::Yield(_) | Expr::YieldFrom(_) => {
-                    self.has_yield = true;
-                }
-                _ => {
-                    self.visit_expr(value);
-                }
-            },
             Stmt::FunctionDef(_) => {
                 // Do not recurse into nested functions; they're evaluated separately.
             }
-            Stmt::Assign(ast::StmtAssign { targets, value, .. }) => {
-                for target in targets {
-                    self.discover_yield_assignments(target, value);
-                }
-            }
-            Stmt::AnnAssign(ast::StmtAnnAssign {
-                target,
-                value: Some(value),
-                ..
-            }) => {
-                self.yield_on_last_visit = false;
-                self.visit_expr(value);
-                self.evaluate_target(target);
-            }
-            Stmt::Return(ast::StmtReturn {
-                value: Some(value),
-                range,
-            }) => {
-                if let Expr::Name(ast::ExprName { ref id, .. }) = **value {
-                    if !matches!(
-                        self.yield_expr_names.get(id.as_str()),
-                        Some(BindState::Reassigned) | None
-                    ) {
-                        return;
-                    }
-                }
-                self.return_ = Some(*range);
-            }
-            _ => ast::statement_visitor::walk_stmt(self, stmt),
-        }
-    }
-}
+            Stmt::Return(ast::StmtReturn { value, range }) => {
+                if value.is_some() {
+                    self.return_ = Some(*range);
+                }
+                return;
+            }
+            _ => ast::visitor::walk_stmt(self, stmt),
+        }
+    }
 
-impl Visitor<'_> for ReturnInGeneratorVisitor {
     fn visit_expr(&mut self, expr: &Expr) {
         match expr {
             Expr::Yield(_) | Expr::YieldFrom(_) => {
                 self.has_yield = true;
-                self.yield_on_last_visit = true;
             }
-            Expr::Lambda(_) | Expr::Call(_) => {}
+            Expr::Lambda(_) => {
+                // Don't traverse into call statements
+            }
             _ => ast::visitor::walk_expr(self, expr),
         }
     }
 }
-
-impl ReturnInGeneratorVisitor {
-    /// Determine if a target is bound to a yield or a yield from expression and,
-    /// if so, track that target
-    fn evaluate_target(&mut self, target: &Expr) {
-        if let Expr::Name(ast::ExprName { ref id, .. }) = *target {
-            if self.yield_on_last_visit {
-                match self.yield_expr_names.get(id.as_str()) {
-                    Some(BindState::Reassigned) => {}
-                    _ => {
-                        self.yield_expr_names
-                            .insert(id.to_string(), BindState::Stored);
-                    }
-                }
-            } else {
-                if let Some(BindState::Stored) = self.yield_expr_names.get(id.as_str()) {
-                    self.yield_expr_names
-                        .insert(id.to_string(), BindState::Reassigned);
-                }
-            }
-        }
-    }
-
-    /// Given a target and a value, track any identifiers that are bound to
-    /// yield or yield from expressions
-    fn discover_yield_assignments(&mut self, target: &Expr, value: &Expr) {
-        match target {
-            Expr::Name(_) => {
-                self.yield_on_last_visit = false;
-                self.visit_expr(value);
-                self.evaluate_target(target);
-            }
-            Expr::Tuple(ast::ExprTuple { elts: tar_elts, .. })
-            | Expr::List(ast::ExprList { elts: tar_elts, .. }) => match value {
-                Expr::Tuple(ast::ExprTuple { elts: val_elts, .. })
-                | Expr::List(ast::ExprList { elts: val_elts, .. })
-                | Expr::Set(ast::ExprSet { elts: val_elts, .. }) => {
-                    self.discover_yield_container_assignments(tar_elts, val_elts);
-                }
-                Expr::Yield(_) | Expr::YieldFrom(_) => {
-                    self.has_yield = true;
-                    self.yield_on_last_visit = true;
-                    self.evaluate_target(target);
-                }
-                _ => {}
-            },
-            _ => {}
-        }
-    }
-
-    fn discover_yield_container_assignments(&mut self, targets: &[Expr], values: &[Expr]) {
-        for (target, value) in targets.iter().zip(values) {
-            match target {
-                Expr::Tuple(ast::ExprTuple { elts: tar_elts, .. })
-                | Expr::List(ast::ExprList { elts: tar_elts, .. })
-                | Expr::Set(ast::ExprSet { elts: tar_elts, .. }) => {
-                    match value {
-                        Expr::Tuple(ast::ExprTuple { elts: val_elts, .. })
-                        | Expr::List(ast::ExprList { elts: val_elts, .. })
-                        | Expr::Set(ast::ExprSet { elts: val_elts, .. }) => {
-                            self.discover_yield_container_assignments(tar_elts, val_elts);
-                        }
-                        Expr::Yield(_) | Expr::YieldFrom(_) => {
-                            self.has_yield = true;
-                            self.yield_on_last_visit = true;
-                            self.evaluate_target(target);
-                        }
-                        _ => {}
-                    };
-                }
-                Expr::Name(_) => {
-                    self.yield_on_last_visit = false;
-                    self.visit_expr(value);
-                    self.evaluate_target(target);
-                }
-                _ => {}
-            }
-        }
-    }
-}

This patch goes beyond what bugbear does because bugbear only considers yield in expression statements. Doing exactly what bugbear wouldn't allow us to address the example raised in the issue.

But I feel like I'm missing an important point because I also see that you added some special handling around return that goes beyond what the bugbear rule does. can you tell me more about the motivation for it?

Note: The bugbear rule also skips this rule when:

# If the user explicitly wrote the 3-argument version of Generator as the
# return annotation, they probably know what they were doing.

This could be a nice addition but doesn't need to be part of this PR.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But I feel like I'm missing an important point because I also see that you added some special handling around return that goes beyond what the bugbear rule does. can you tell me more about the motivation for it?

I think I might have got a bit carried away there by trying to cover as many scenarios as I could think of instead of trying to match the bugbear behavior (to be honest, it only now occurred to me that that might have been the goal!). The idea was that a function returning a variable can be valid or invalid depending on what the variable holds, e.g.

def f():
    x = yield from []
    return x
	
def g():
    x = 0
    yield from []
    return x

which would then necessitate some inference on what it is that the function is returning. I can totally drop that part if it's preferable to as closely as possible match what bugbear does!

Ty for the suggestions and the tip on Visitor! I'll adjust the approach based on these examples, with now a better idea of the constraints involved.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh I see, thanks. Covering assignments already means we go beyond what bugbear does. So just matching "bugbear" is a bit tricky 😅

@AlexWaygood what's your take on this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
preview Related to preview mode features rule Implementing or modifying a lint rule
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

B901: Misses yield sub-expresisons
2 participants