Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(lambda-nodejs): docker image is built when not required #27886

Closed

Conversation

tmokmss
Copy link
Contributor

@tmokmss tmokmss commented Nov 8, 2023

This is a small optimization to get rid of unnecessary building of container images. Currently the docker image required for NodejsFunction bundling (e.g. public.ecr.aws/sam/build-nodejs18.x) is always built regardless of necessity, which sometimes makes cdk commands slow.

This PR fixes the current behavior; If bundling is not required for an NodejsFunction's asset, we just skip it, which is also a consistent behavior with PythonFunction.

public static bundle(options: BundlingProps): AssetCode {
return Code.fromAsset(options.entry, {
assetHash: options.assetHash,
assetHashType: options.assetHashType,
exclude: DEPENDENCY_EXCLUDES,
bundling: options.skip ? undefined : new Bundling(options),
});

skip: !Stack.of(scope).bundlingRequired,

edit) turns out it's not very easy to fix, because currently the construct seems to expect the bundling preprocess always run to work properly.


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@github-actions github-actions bot added the p2 label Nov 8, 2023
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team November 8, 2023 07:29
@github-actions github-actions bot added the star-contributor [Pilot] contributed between 25-49 PRs to the CDK label Nov 8, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

@tmokmss
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmokmss commented Nov 8, 2023

Exemption Request: As far as I know this is kind of a change that cannot be tested with integ-runner, because the change affects cases when we don't deploy a stack.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr-linter/exemption-requested The contributor has requested an exemption to the PR Linter feedback. label Nov 8, 2023
@tmokmss tmokmss changed the title fix(lambda-nodejs): don't build docker images when not required fix(lambda-nodejs): docker image is built when not required Nov 8, 2023
@tmokmss tmokmss marked this pull request as draft November 8, 2023 08:27
this does not fix the issue... but commit it anyway
@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: b845986
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR has been in the CHANGES REQUESTED state for 3 weeks, and looks abandoned. To keep this PR from being closed, please continue work on it. If not, it will automatically be closed in a week.

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR has been deemed to be abandoned, and will be automatically closed. Please create a new PR for these changes if you think this decision has been made in error.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the closed-for-staleness This issue was automatically closed because it hadn't received any attention in a while. label Dec 8, 2023
@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

The pull request linter fails with the following errors:

❌ Fixes must contain a change to an integration test file and the resulting snapshot.

PRs must pass status checks before we can provide a meaningful review.

If you would like to request an exemption from the status checks or clarification on feedback, please leave a comment on this PR containing Exemption Request and/or Clarification Request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
closed-for-staleness This issue was automatically closed because it hadn't received any attention in a while. p2 pr-linter/exemption-requested The contributor has requested an exemption to the PR Linter feedback. star-contributor [Pilot] contributed between 25-49 PRs to the CDK
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants