LCFS-1659: Incorrect fuel type list in Fuels for other use #1658
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
areyeslo
changed the title
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
prv-proton
requested changes
Jan 14, 2025
prv-proton
reviewed
Jan 14, 2025
areyeslo
force-pushed
the
LCFS-1207-AddFuelCodeCIColumnsFuelsOtherUse_v2
branch
from
cc9d106 to
dd0aaa2
Compare
areyeslo
force-pushed
the
LCFS-1207-AddFuelCodeCIColumnsFuelsOtherUse_v2
branch
from
9b64428 to
ef67759
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fix is focused on getting the correct list in fuel_type. The data might be changed in Dev and affected the list shown in the dropdown.
In addition, added clearing provisionOfTheAct when changing fuel_type.
Note: Renewable naphtha is not included because its fuel code is expired.
Story