Fix deployment_id to deployment-id in workflow files

[michalchecinski]

🎟️ Tracking

📔 Objective

Fix deployment_id parameter in chrnorm/deployment-status to deployment-id.

⏰ Reminders before review

• Contributor guidelines followed
• All formatters and local linters executed and passed
• Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
• Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
• Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
• CI builds passed
• Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
• Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation
  team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

• 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
• 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
• ❓ (:question:) for questions
• 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed
  issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
• 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
• ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
• 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
• ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 10.17%. Comparing base (9311d40) to head (71ceeb9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1211   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   10.17%   10.17%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines        1101     1101           
=======================================
  Hits          112      112           
  Misses        989      989           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – 0464cb71-654c-4733-98bb-f77091508b36

Great job, no security vulnerabilities found in this Pull Request