Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add documentation regarding security issues and the status of Wasm proposals #3972

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lum1n0us
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

doc/security_need_to_know.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/security_need_to_know.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/security_need_to_know.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/stability_wasm_proposals.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/stability_wasm_proposals.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/security_need_to_know.md Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/security_need_to_know.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/security_need_to_know.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/stability_wasm_proposals.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/stability_wasm_proposals.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@TianlongLiang TianlongLiang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@wenyongh wenyongh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

| Bulk memory operations | Yes | `WAMR_BUILD_BULK_MEMORY` |
| Extended Constant Expressions | Yes | N/A |
| Fixed-width SIMD[^1] | Yes | `WAMR_BUILD_SIMD` |
| Legacy Exception handling[^2] | Yes | `WAMR_BUILD_EXCE_HANDLING` |
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the "legacy" EH is its phase 3 version. it's misleading to say ">= Phase 4" "yes".

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agree, it's a bit confusing. Also, given the "legacy" EH proposal is legacy and never actually was standardized, should we make it off by default to discourage people from using it?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please share your thoughts on the most recent version. 🤝

Copy link
Collaborator

@loganek loganek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants