Linting and authorship info for CITATIONS

[tkphd]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

• 🎯 correct output
• 🖼️ correct figures
• ❓ new warnings
• ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/carpentries-incubator/hpc-workflows/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-16

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

 01-introduction.md                                | 25 +++++++---
 02-snakemake_on_the_cluster.md                    | 31 ++++++++----
 03-placeholders.md                                | 11 +++--
 04-snakemake_and_mpi.md                           | 57 +++++++++++++++++------
 05-chaining_rules.md                              | 25 +++++++---
 06-expansion.md                                   | 32 ++++++++-----
 CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md                                |  1 -
 config.yaml                                       | 24 +++++-----
 files/snakefiles/cluster_profile_ep02/config.yaml |  3 +-
 files/snakefiles/cluster_profile_ep04/config.yaml |  5 +-
 md5sum.txt                                        | 16 +++----
 11 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)

What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2024-05-02 21:19:14 +0000

[reid-a]

Looks good, thanks!