-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 311
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove experimental ops file disable-v2-api #1230
Remove experimental ops file disable-v2-api #1230
Conversation
operations/experimental/README.md
Outdated
@@ -11,43 +11,43 @@ This is the README for Experimental Ops-files. To learn more about `cf-deploymen | |||
|
|||
# Experimental ops files | |||
|
|||
| Name | Purpose | Notes | Currently validated in Release Integration CI pipelines? | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have you opened the Markdown file in IntelliJ? It reformats the whole file which makes diffs hard to detect. Better open it in a plain text editor.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I managed to adjust the file in sublime and the diff looks much better now.
c02c767
to
d215070
Compare
@@ -23,10 +23,6 @@ disable-logs-in-firehose.yml: {} | |||
disable-logs-in-firehose-windows2019.yml: | |||
ops: | |||
- ../windows2019-cell.yml | |||
disable-v2-api.yml: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we still need this unit test. There's a check in place that ensures that all ops files have a test, even if the ops file just consists of comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
It's also not a breaking change as the ops file is not removed, can you please adapt the description? |
Hello friend, it looks like your pull request has failed one or more of our checks. Please take a look! 👀 |
d215070
to
fe4e918
Compare
WHAT is this change about?
API v2 is disabled by default, see cloudfoundry/capi-release#503 and RFC0032 - CF API v2 End of Life
Please provide any contextual information.
Since API v2 is disabled by default there is no need of experimental ops file disable-v2-api.
Has a cf-deployment including this change passed cf-acceptance-tests?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? Please take a moment to read through the examples before answering the question.
Does this PR introduce a new BOSH release into the base cf-deployment.yml manifest or any ops-files?
Does this PR make a change to an experimental or GA'd feature/component?
Please provide Acceptance Criteria for this change?
What is the level of urgency for publishing this change?
Tag your pair, your PM, and/or team!