-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[12_5_X] Update Run3 offline and offline_relval GTs #39824
[12_5_X] Update Run3 offline and offline_relval GTs #39824
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @francescobrivio for CMSSW_12_5_X. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
backport of #39823 |
@cmsbuild please test |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-hlt_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS ---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-es_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS ---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-ctpps_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS ---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-ecal_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS and more ... Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Pull request #39824 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please check and sign again. |
please test with #39829 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b0e5db/28463/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
In the last run of tests we see differences in |
Another example of #39803. |
+alca
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_6_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
Pull request #39824 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild , please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b0e5db/28716/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+alca
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_6_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@cms-sw/orp-l2 I have some follow-up backport which will conflict with this PR, can you please merge this in today's 2300 IB so I can correctly make the next PR and avoid rebasing? thanks! |
+1 |
PR description:
Backport of #39823
This PR updates the offline GT (
auto:run3_data
) with the latest conditions to be used for the 2022ABCD re-reco (see this CMSTalk post). The offline relval GT (auto:run3_data_relval
) is updated as well to be even with the offline GT.GT differences:
Run 3 data (offline)
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/124X_dataRun3_v9/124X_dataRun3_v11
Run 3 data RelVals
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/125X_dataRun3_relval_v1/125X_dataRun3_relval_v4
Diff between new offline and new offline_relval GTs
https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/124X_dataRun3_v11/125X_dataRun3_relval_v4
PR validation:
Successfully ran:
runTheMatrix.py -l 139.001 --ibeos -j 4
which consumes the relval GT.
Backport:
Backport of #39823