Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

it compiles #6

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Jun 11, 2024
Merged

it compiles #6

merged 20 commits into from
Jun 11, 2024

Conversation

fluffywaffles
Copy link
Contributor

had to rebase on main so that I had access to bridger code

@kevincheng96 kevincheng96 changed the base branch from main to kevin/validation June 7, 2024 15:48
Copy link
Contributor

@kevincheng96 kevincheng96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The refactoring of the validation code looks great. Haven't taken a look at the code involving constructing Quark operations yet, I figure I should just take a look at Hans' PR for that.

test/Multicall.t.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/builder/BridgeRoutes.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/builder/BridgeRoutes.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/builder/BridgeRoutes.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/builder/BridgeRoutes.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/builder/QuarkBuilder.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fluffywaffles fluffywaffles force-pushed the jordan/and-on branch 2 times, most recently from 6863805 to 907ca6f Compare June 7, 2024 21:07
string actionType;
bytes actionContext;
// One of the PAYMENT_METHOD_* constants.
string paymentMethod;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess we should put a TODO: for paymentMethod?
It seems I can't find where it gets initialized or specified anywhere 🤔

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is set in #8

src/builder/Accounts.sol Show resolved Hide resolved
src/builder/Actions.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
This constructs an Action struct for the Transfer flow. Tests are now
passing.

We also re-run the forge formatter using the version of foundry expected
by CI. In fact, most of the diffs in this PR are formatter changes.
The gas snapshot CI action was failing because the project's `via-ir`
settings were moved to a new Foundry profile, but our scripts and CI
actions were not modified to use the Foundry profile.
@kevincheng96 kevincheng96 merged commit df3d161 into kevin/validation Jun 11, 2024
4 checks passed
@kevincheng96 kevincheng96 deleted the jordan/and-on branch June 11, 2024 20:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants