Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add example test for forwards compat of custom setting #17524

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 21, 2025

Conversation

AbrilRBS
Copy link
Member

@AbrilRBS AbrilRBS commented Dec 25, 2024

Changelog: Omit
Docs: Omit

As part of the answer for #17523, I thought that a test that reflects the desired behaviour would be great to have, as a reference point for the future

Update: Now seeing the linked issue, OP was not exactly following this approach, but I think it's still worth it to add something like this

test/integration/package_id/compatible_test.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/package_id/compatible_test.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/package_id/compatible_test.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/integration/package_id/compatible_test.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@memsharded memsharded merged commit 5a67746 into conan-io:develop2 Jan 21, 2025
32 checks passed
@AbrilRBS AbrilRBS deleted the ar/compat-libc-test branch January 21, 2025 19:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[question] Is it possible to model the glibc forward compatibility?
2 participants