-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
0 parents
commit 2286f8f
Showing
21 changed files
with
3,164 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
^LICENSE\.md$ |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
.Rproj.user | ||
.Rhistory | ||
.RData | ||
.Ruserdata | ||
_book |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,284 @@ | ||
# Statistical Learning | ||
|
||
## Conceptual | ||
|
||
### Question 1 | ||
|
||
> For each of parts (a) through (d), indicate whether we would generally expect | ||
> the performance of a flexible statistical learning method to be better or | ||
> worse than an inflexible method. Justify your answer. | ||
> | ||
> a. The sample size n is extremely large, and the number of predictors p is | ||
> small. | ||
> b. The number of predictors p is extremely large, and the number of | ||
> observations n is small. | ||
> c. The relationship between the predictors and response is highly | ||
> non-linear. | ||
> d. The variance of the error terms, i.e. $\sigma^2 = Var(\epsilon)$, is | ||
> extremely high. | ||
### Question 2 | ||
|
||
> Explain whether each scenario is a classification or regression problem, and | ||
> indicate whether we are most interested in inference or prediction. Finally, | ||
> provide n and p. | ||
> | ||
> a. We collect a set of data on the top 500 firms in the US. For each firm | ||
> we record profit, number of employees, industry and the CEO salary. We are | ||
> interested in understanding which factors affect CEO salary. | ||
> | ||
> b. We are considering launching a new product and wish to know whether | ||
> it will be a success or a failure. We collect data on 20 similar products | ||
> that were previously launched. For each product we have recorded whether it | ||
> was a success or failure, price charged for the product, marketing budget, | ||
> competition price, and ten other variables. | ||
> | ||
> c. We are interested in predicting the % change in the USD/Euro exchange | ||
> rate in relation to the weekly changes in the world stock markets. Hence we | ||
> collect weekly data for all of 2012. For each week we record the % change | ||
> in the USD/Euro, the % change in the US market, the % change in the British | ||
> market, and the % change in the German market. | ||
### Question 3 | ||
|
||
> We now revisit the bias-variance decomposition. | ||
> | ||
> a. Provide a sketch of typical (squared) bias, variance, training error, | ||
> test error, and Bayes (or irreducible) error curves, on a single plot, as | ||
> we go from less flexible statistical learning methods towards more flexible | ||
> approaches. The x-axis should represent the amount of flexibility in the | ||
> method, and the y-axis should represent the values for each curve. There | ||
> should be five curves. Make sure to label each one. | ||
> | ||
> b. Explain why each of the five curves has the shape displayed in | ||
> part (a). | ||
### Question 4 | ||
|
||
> You will now think of some real-life applications for statistical learning. | ||
> | ||
> a. Describe three real-life applications in which classification might | ||
> be useful. Describe the response, as well as the predictors. Is the goal of | ||
> each application inference or prediction? Explain your answer. | ||
> | ||
> b. Describe three real-life applications in which regression might be | ||
> useful. Describe the response, as well as the predictors. Is the goal of | ||
> each application inference or prediction? Explain your answer. | ||
> | ||
> c. Describe three real-life applications in which cluster analysis might be | ||
> useful. | ||
### Question 5 | ||
|
||
> What are the advantages and disadvantages of a very flexible (versus a less | ||
> flexible) approach for regression or classification? Under what circumstances | ||
> might a more flexible approach be preferred to a less flexible approach? When | ||
> might a less flexible approach be preferred? | ||
### Question 6 | ||
|
||
> Describe the differences between a parametric and a non-parametric statistical | ||
> learning approach. What are the advantages of a para- metric approach to | ||
> regression or classification (as opposed to a non- parametric approach)? What | ||
> are its disadvantages? | ||
### Question 7 | ||
|
||
> The table below provides a training data set containing six observations, | ||
> three predictors, and one qualitative response variable. | ||
> | ||
> | Obs. | $X_1$ | $X_2$ | $X_3$ | $Y$ | | ||
> |------|-------|-------|-------|-------| | ||
> | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | Red | | ||
> | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | Red | | ||
> | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | Red | | ||
> | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | Green | | ||
> | 5 | -1 | 0 | 1 | Green | | ||
> | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Red | | ||
> | ||
> Suppose we wish to use this data set to make a prediction for $Y$ when | ||
> $X_1 = X_2 = X_3 = 0$ using $K$-nearest neighbors. | ||
> | ||
> a. Compute the Euclidean distance between each observation and the test | ||
> point, $X_1 = X_2 = X_3 = 0$. | ||
> | ||
> b. What is our prediction with $K = 1$? Why? | ||
> | ||
> c. What is our prediction with $K = 3$? Why? | ||
> | ||
> d. If the Bayes decision boundary in this problem is highly non-linear, then | ||
> would we expect the best value for $K$ to be large or small? Why? | ||
```{r} | ||
dat <- data.frame( | ||
"x1" = c(0, 2, 0, 0, -1, 1), | ||
"x2" = c(3, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1), | ||
"x3" = c(0, 0, 3, 2, 1, 1), | ||
"y" = c("Red", "Red", "Red", "Green", "Green", "Red") | ||
) | ||
``` | ||
|
||
## Applied | ||
|
||
### Question 8 | ||
|
||
> This exercise relates to the `College` data set, which can be found in | ||
> the file `College.csv`. It contains a number of variables for 777 different | ||
> universities and colleges in the US. The variables are | ||
> | ||
> * `Private` : Public/private indicator | ||
> * `Apps` : Number of applications received | ||
> * `Accept` : Number of applicants accepted | ||
> * `Enroll` : Number of new students enrolled | ||
> * `Top10perc` : New students from top 10% of high school class | ||
> * `Top25perc` : New students from top 25% of high school class | ||
> * `F.Undergrad` : Number of full-time undergraduates | ||
> * `P.Undergrad` : Number of part-time undergraduates | ||
> * `Outstate` : Out-of-state tuition | ||
> * `Room.Board` : Room and board costs | ||
> * `Books` : Estimated book costs | ||
> * `Personal` : Estimated personal spending | ||
> * `PhD` : Percent of faculty with Ph.D.'s | ||
> * `Terminal` : Percent of faculty with terminal degree | ||
> * `S.F.Ratio` : Student/faculty ratio | ||
> * `perc.alumni` : Percent of alumni who donate | ||
> * `Expend` : Instructional expenditure per student | ||
> * `Grad.Rate` : Graduation rate | ||
> | ||
> Before reading the data into `R`, it can be viewed in Excel or a text | ||
> editor. | ||
> | ||
> a. Use the `read.csv()` function to read the data into `R`. Call the loaded | ||
> data `college`. Make sure that you have the directory set to the correct | ||
> location for the data. | ||
> | ||
> b. Look at the data using the `View()` function. You should notice that the | ||
> first column is just the name of each university. We don't really want `R` | ||
> to treat this as data. However, it may be handy to have these names for | ||
> later. Try the following commands: | ||
> | ||
> ```r | ||
> rownames(college) <- college[, 1] | ||
> View(college) | ||
> ``` | ||
> | ||
> You should see that there is now a `row.names` column with the name of | ||
> each university recorded. This means that R has given each row a name | ||
> corresponding to the appropriate university. `R` will not try to perform | ||
> calculations on the row names. However, we still need to eliminate the | ||
> first column in the data where the names are stored. Try | ||
> | ||
> ```r | ||
> college <- college [, -1] | ||
> View(college) | ||
> ``` | ||
> | ||
> Now you should see that the first data column is `Private`. Note that | ||
> another column labeled `row.names` now appears before the `Private` column. | ||
> However, this is not a data column but rather the name that R is giving to | ||
> each row. | ||
> | ||
> c. | ||
> i. Use the `summary()` function to produce a numerical summary of the | ||
> variables in the data set. | ||
> ii. Use the `pairs()` function to produce a scatterplot matrix of the | ||
> first ten columns or variables of the data. Recall that you can | ||
> reference the first ten columns of a matrix A using `A[,1:10]`. | ||
> iii. Use the `plot()` function to produce side-by-side boxplots of | ||
> `Outstate` versus `Private`. | ||
> iv. Create a new qualitative variable, called `Elite`, by _binning_ the | ||
> `Top10perc` variable. We are going to divide universities into two | ||
> groups based on whether or not the proportion of students coming from | ||
> the top 10% of their high school classes exceeds 50%. | ||
> | ||
> ```r | ||
> > Elite <- rep("No", nrow(college)) | ||
> > Elite[college$Top10perc > 50] <- "Yes" | ||
> > Elite <- as.factor(Elite) | ||
> > college <- data.frame(college, Elite) | ||
> ``` | ||
> | ||
> Use the `summary()` function to see how many elite universities there | ||
> are. Now use the `plot()` function to produce side-by-side boxplots of | ||
> `Outstate` versus `Elite`. | ||
> v. Use the `hist()` function to produce some histograms with differing | ||
> numbers of bins for a few of the quantitative variables. You may find | ||
> the command `par(mfrow=c(2,2))` useful: it will divide the print | ||
> window into four regions so that four plots can be made | ||
> simultaneously. Modifying the arguments to this function will divide | ||
> the screen in other ways. | ||
> vi. Continue exploring the data, and provide a brief summary of what you | ||
> discover. | ||
### Question 9 | ||
|
||
> This exercise involves the Auto data set studied in the lab. Make sure | ||
> that the missing values have been removed from the data. | ||
> | ||
> a. Which of the predictors are quantitative, and which are qualitative? | ||
> | ||
> b. What is the range of each quantitative predictor? You can answer this using | ||
> the `range()` function. | ||
> | ||
> c. What is the mean and standard deviation of each quantitative predictor? | ||
> | ||
> d. Now remove the 10th through 85th observations. What is the range, mean, and | ||
> standard deviation of each predictor in the subset of the data that | ||
> remains? | ||
> | ||
> e. Using the full data set, investigate the predictors graphically, using | ||
> scatterplots or other tools of your choice. Create some plots highlighting | ||
> the relationships among the predictors. Comment on your findings. | ||
> | ||
> f. Suppose that we wish to predict gas mileage (`mpg`) on the basis of the | ||
> other variables. Do your plots suggest that any of the other variables | ||
> might be useful in predicting `mpg`? Justify your answer. | ||
### Question 10 | ||
|
||
> This exercise involves the `Boston` housing data set. | ||
> | ||
> a. To begin, load in the `Boston` data set. The `Boston` data set is part of | ||
> the `ISLR2` library in R. | ||
> | ||
> ```r | ||
> > library(MASS) | ||
> ``` | ||
> | ||
> Now the data set is contained in the object `Boston`. | ||
> | ||
> ```r | ||
> > Boston | ||
> ``` | ||
> | ||
> Read about the data set: | ||
> | ||
> ```r | ||
> > ?Boston | ||
> ``` | ||
> | ||
> How many rows are in this data set? How many columns? What do the rows and | ||
> columns represent? | ||
> | ||
> b. Make some pairwise scatterplots of the predictors (columns) in this data | ||
> set. Describe your findings. | ||
> | ||
> c. Are any of the predictors associated with per capita crime rate? If so, | ||
> explain the relationship. | ||
> | ||
> d. Do any of the census tracts of Boston appear to have particularly high | ||
> crime rates? Tax rates? Pupil-teacher ratios? Comment on the range of each | ||
> predictor. | ||
> | ||
> e. How many of the census tracts in this data set bound the Charles river? | ||
> | ||
> f. What is the median pupil-teacher ratio among the towns in this data set? | ||
> | ||
> g. Which census tract of Boston has lowest median value of owner-occupied | ||
> homes? What are the values of the other predictors for that census tract, | ||
> and how do those values compare to the overall ranges for those predictors? | ||
> Comment on your findings. | ||
> | ||
> h. In this data set, how many of the census tract average more than seven | ||
> rooms per dwelling? More than eight rooms per dwelling? Comment on the | ||
> census tracts that average more than eight rooms per dwelling. |
Oops, something went wrong.