Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BEP466 #80

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

BEP466 #80

wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

yoshidan
Copy link
Contributor

@yoshidan yoshidan commented Nov 27, 2024

Signed-off-by: Naohiro Yoshida <[email protected]>
@yoshidan yoshidan marked this pull request as ready for review December 27, 2024 02:44
@3100 3100 self-requested a review January 21, 2025 03:08
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Yoshida <[email protected]>
Naohiro Yoshida added 4 commits January 28, 2025 18:59
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Yoshida <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Yoshida <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Yoshida <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Yoshida <[email protected]>
@@ -489,6 +431,11 @@ impl TryFrom<RawETHHeader> for ETHHeader {
None
};

#[allow(clippy::absurd_extreme_comparisons)]
if PASCAL_TIMESTAMP > 0 && timestamp >= PASCAL_TIMESTAMP && requests_hash.is_none() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When PASCAL_TIMESTAMP is 0, it's interpreted as not being Pascal, rather than indicating it's already activated.
It would be helpful to have explanatory comments near where users specify this value, to prevent misunderstandings since this behavior differs from flag management in geth and bsc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants