-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(snowflake): set is_temp_table and is_allowed_table function for SqlParsingAggregator in SnowflakeV2Source #12438
feat(snowflake): set is_temp_table and is_allowed_table function for SqlParsingAggregator in SnowflakeV2Source #12438
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is ✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.
... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
): | ||
return True | ||
|
||
# This is also a temp table if |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe note that this logic mirrors the logic from snowflake_queries.py?
not sure if there's a way to remove the code duplication, but that'd be even better
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR extends the existing note here
https://github.com/datahub-project/datahub/blob/master/metadata-ingestion/src/datahub/ingestion/source/snowflake/snowflake_v2.py#L545-L547
which is what causes the duplication
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only thing that comes to my mind would be to give the responsibility of instantiating SqlParsingAggregator
to the SnowflakeV2Source
itself, so SnowflakeQueriesExtractor
gets it as constructor parameter.
This way we still instantiate SqlParsingAggregator
twice but is_temp_table
and is_allowed_table
would be defined once in the SnowflakeV2Source
WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I spent some time trying this, and it's getting complicated, so I'm leaving it as is.
Checklist