Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix benchmark imports #2343

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 20, 2025
Merged

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Feb 20, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Enhanced test coverage to boost reliability by incorporating parameterized testing for module import validation.
    • Refined the benchmarking approach for command line interface tests, ensuring more consistent performance verification.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 20, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the CLI testing module by introducing a new test function that parameterizes and benchmarks the import of a specified module. The changes add an import for mock from the unittest module, remove the @pytest.mark.benchmark decorator from the existing test_cli function, and implement test_bench_module_import. This new test function patches sys.modules to an empty dictionary before dynamically importing the given module using importlib.import_module, thus refining the approach to benchmarking and module import testing.

Changes

File Change Summary
tests/test_cli.py - Added from unittest import mock.
- Removed @pytest.mark.benchmark from test_cli.
- Added test_bench_module_import with @pytest.mark.parametrize that uses a benchmark-decorated nested function to patch sys.modules and import a module dynamically.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant T as test_bench_module_import
    participant B as Benchmark Decorator
    participant P as Patch (sys.modules = {})
    participant I as importlib.import_module

    T->>B: Decorates inner function
    T->>P: Patches sys.modules to {}
    T->>I: Imports module "reacnetgenerator.commandline"
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8d83b61 and a4d8e2a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/test_cli.py (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/test_cli.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp38-win_amd64
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@njzjz njzjz requested a review from Copilot February 20, 2025 08:26
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
tests/test_cli.py (1)

27-27: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix syntax error in parametrize decorator.

The parametrize decorator is missing a closing parenthesis.

Apply this fix as suggested in the previous review:

-@pytest.mark.parametrize("mod_name", ["reacnetgenerator.commandline"]
+@pytest.mark.parametrize("mod_name", ["reacnetgenerator.commandline"])
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)

27-28: SyntaxError: Expected ')', found newline

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 36fa554 and 8d83b61.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/test_cli.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
tests/test_cli.py

27-28: SyntaxError: Expected ')', found newline

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp310-manylinux_aarch64
  • GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp39-macosx_universal2
  • GitHub Check: Test with tox
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/test_cli.py (2)

6-6: LGTM!

The import is correctly placed with other standard library imports and is necessary for the new test function.


22-24: LGTM!

The removal of the benchmark decorator is appropriate as it aligns with the PR's objective to fix benchmark imports.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.13%. Comparing base (3432fe3) to head (a4d8e2a).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2343   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.13%   95.13%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        1417     1417           
=======================================
  Hits         1348     1348           
  Misses         69       69           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 20, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #2343 will not alter performance

Comparing njzjz:fix-bench-imports (a4d8e2a) with master (36fa554)

Summary

✅ 7 untouched benchmarks
🆕 1 new benchmarks
⁉️ 1 (👁 1) dropped benchmarks

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
🆕 test_bench_module_import[reacnetgenerator.commandline] N/A 800.7 µs N/A
👁 test_cli 387.5 µs N/A N/A

@njzjz njzjz added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 20, 2025
Merged via the queue into deepmodeling:master with commit 34ba3d3 Feb 20, 2025
22 checks passed
@njzjz njzjz deleted the fix-bench-imports branch February 20, 2025 08:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant