-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: fix benchmark imports #2343
Conversation
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the CLI testing module by introducing a new test function that parameterizes and benchmarks the import of a specified module. The changes add an import for Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant T as test_bench_module_import
participant B as Benchmark Decorator
participant P as Patch (sys.modules = {})
participant I as importlib.import_module
T->>B: Decorates inner function
T->>P: Patches sys.modules to {}
T->>I: Imports module "reacnetgenerator.commandline"
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
tests/test_cli.py (1)
27-27
:⚠️ Potential issueFix syntax error in parametrize decorator.
The parametrize decorator is missing a closing parenthesis.
Apply this fix as suggested in the previous review:
-@pytest.mark.parametrize("mod_name", ["reacnetgenerator.commandline"] +@pytest.mark.parametrize("mod_name", ["reacnetgenerator.commandline"])🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
27-28: SyntaxError: Expected ')', found newline
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/test_cli.py
(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
tests/test_cli.py
27-28: SyntaxError: Expected ')', found newline
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp310-manylinux_aarch64
- GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp39-macosx_universal2
- GitHub Check: Test with tox
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/test_cli.py (2)
6-6
: LGTM!The import is correctly placed with other standard library imports and is necessary for the new test function.
22-24
: LGTM!The removal of the benchmark decorator is appropriate as it aligns with the PR's objective to fix benchmark imports.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2343 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.13% 95.13%
=======================================
Files 17 17
Lines 1417 1417
=======================================
Hits 1348 1348
Misses 69 69 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #2343 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
Benchmarks breakdown
|
Summary by CodeRabbit