Anagram

[taokinbo]

In this pull request, we have added an anagram game with the features of:

• Word bank with shuffle options
• A give up and Restart button
• Scoring System (target word adds point value of 2 times the length of word. Extra words add only length of word)
• Definitions (with additional definitions for each target word when hovered)
• Examples (when hovered over the target words)
• Instructions Modal (actual instructions will be inputed later)
• Timer
• Loading Screen
• Game over functions
• A Landing Page contain the main text and game options for different parts of speech for the anagram games.
• A color scheme that matches quiz page.

@ryaanahmed

[ryaanahmed]

This is SO GOOD. I don't even have any of my usual nitpicky code style feedback: the code is beautifully easy to read, documented, well structured, and tested. Fantastic work.

I removed the dependency_parsing module taken from Gender Analysis Toolkit, as in the end this project wasn't using it.

I have some comments, but these should be taken as directions for further work and refinement -- nothing here prevents me merging.

1. Let's add mode where the pool of available letters is separated by words (so it's a classic anagram per word, not an anagram of all the words all mixed together. As is, the game is pretty hard!
2. After hitting "Give up" add a distinction between in "Words found" between words that the student found and those given by the answer key.
3. "Extra words" isn't really clear: took me a little experimenting to figure out what that was about. Plus it shows the confetti animation, even though those aren't correct answers.
4. Needs some responsive design work: I think this interface is totally feasible to make work at the narrower screen sizes, but right now the main columns in the interface squish together instead of stacking.
5. Add instructions in the placeholder place and show that modal by default when you open the game.
6. The hover definitions feature wasn't very clear to me when I first hovered: I was confused about what I was seeing. Maybe that could be more apparent in the interface or labeled better? (Even "other definitions" would make it clearer)

Merging. Fantastic work. (If folks on the team could make some follow up issues from the comments above, would be great...)