Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cleanup animationinfo #7707
Cleanup animationinfo #7707
Changes from all commits
5638118
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Personally, I'd leave it as it is, as the log and the local variable are less confusing that way.
For clarity we could also change the if from
ticksSinceSequenceStarted_
toticksSinceSequenceStarted
.But maybe that is just personal taste 😉.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could this be a private method?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm still not sure if this is a good move. On the one hand the function is smaller. On the other hand, the new function has only 21 lines less than
setNewAnimation
and now we have another function with many parameters. 🤷Maybe we could remove some of the parameters. If we use the
ticksPerFrame
member (assigned insetNewAnimation
) instead of passing it as a variable. The same fornumberOfFrames
.We could also replace
numSkippedFrames
withcurrentFrame
, but that might be going a bit too far.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You may be right. I was too concerned with salvaging the potentially useful parts of the original PR, but I didn't take enough time to consider the best way to approach cleaning up this file. I think I may just close it instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this function include documentation, e.g. `@brief'?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes