0205 poo encapsulamento #260
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…0_fundamentos Merge dos Exercícios da Branch "00_fundamentos"
…1_estrutura_de_dados Merge dos Exercícios da Branch "01_estrutura_de_dados"
…2_programacao_orientada_objetos Merge dos Exercícios da Branch "02 programacao orientada objetos"
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Podemos ver em "Aplicando encapsulamento em Python" na segunda aula ("Recursos públicos e privados") que tornar um atributo privado em python existe apenas uma convenção, entretanto o python implementa o 'Name Mangling' para tornar o atributo inacessível de fora da classe
We can see on "Aplicando encapsulamento em Python", in the second class ("Recursos públicos e privados"), that making a property into a private is only a good practice, but Python got 'Name Mangling' to change the access to a property