Fix ESLint configuration #1012
Fix ESLint configuration #1012
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes changes to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🔇 Additional comments (5)config/webpack/development.js (2)
Using
The migration to ESLint's flat config system is a good modernization step. However, let's verify the setup:
Consider documenting the ESLint configuration migration in the project's README or documentation to help other contributors understand the new setup. ✅ Verification successfulThe initial verification shows that the flat config file exists and ESLint dependencies are up-to-date (eslint ^9.15.0). However, I'd like to verify the content of the config file and check for any potential legacy config imports before making a final determination. ESLint flat config setup is correctly implemented The verification confirms that:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check if the ESLint config file exists
if [ -f "eslint.config.mjs" ]; then
echo "✓ eslint.config.mjs exists"
else
echo "✗ eslint.config.mjs not found"
fi
# Check package.json for ESLint and related dependencies
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
echo "ESLint-related dependencies:"
jq '.dependencies + .devDependencies | with_entries(select(.key | contains("eslint")))' package.json
fi
# Look for any other potential ESLint config files that might conflict
fd -H -E node_modules "\.eslintrc\.*"
Length of output: 466 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check the content of eslint.config.mjs to verify it's properly configured for flat config
cat eslint.config.mjs
# Check if there are any imports of old eslintrc files that might cause conflicts
rg -l "require.*\.eslintrc" .
Length of output: 400 package.json (3)
The Font Awesome packages have been updated from 6.6.0 to 6.7.1. While this is a minor version bump, it's good practice to verify compatibility with the project's Node.js version requirement. ✅ Verification successfulFont Awesome 6.7.1 packages are compatible with project's Node.js requirement The Font Awesome packages require Node.js 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Font Awesome package compatibility with Node.js versions
# Get the package.json engines field for reference
echo "Project Node.js requirement:"
jq '.engines.node' package.json
# Check Font Awesome package requirements
echo "\nFont Awesome package requirements:"
for pkg in "@fortawesome/fontawesome-svg-core" "@fortawesome/free-brands-svg-icons" "@fortawesome/free-regular-svg-icons" "@fortawesome/free-solid-svg-icons"; do
curl -s "https://registry.npmjs.org/$pkg/6.7.1" | jq '.engines'
done
Length of output: 1278
The PostCSS updates (postcss: 8.4.47 → 8.4.49, postcss-preset-env: 10.0.9 → 10.1.1) appear safe as they are patch/minor updates. However, we should verify compatibility with other CSS-related packages in the project. Also applies to: 35-35 ✅ Verification successfulPostCSS update appears safe to proceed The package.json analysis shows all PostCSS-related packages are using compatible versions:
The latest PostCSS release only includes a minor fix for custom syntax. No PostCSS configuration files or direct PostCSS usage were found in the codebase, suggesting it's primarily used through build tooling. The webpack configuration shows standard CSS/SCSS processing setup without any special PostCSS customizations that could be impacted. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential PostCSS compatibility issues
# List all PostCSS related dependencies
echo "PostCSS related packages in package.json:"
jq '.dependencies | with_entries(select(.key | contains("postcss")))' package.json
# Check for any known conflicts or breaking changes
for pkg in "postcss" "postcss-preset-env"; do
echo "\nChecking $pkg release notes:"
gh api repos/postcss/$pkg/releases/latest --jq '.body'
done
Length of output: 949 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any PostCSS configuration files and usage patterns
echo "Searching for PostCSS config files:"
fd -e js -e cjs -e mjs -e json --full-path -g '*postcss*config*'
echo -e "\nChecking for PostCSS plugin usage in the codebase:"
rg -l "postcss\(" --type js --type ts
echo -e "\nChecking webpack/build configurations for PostCSS setup:"
fd -e js -e ts -e json -g '*webpack*' -x cat {}
Length of output: 1253
The updates to ESLint (9.14.0 → 9.15.0), neostandard (0.11.7 → 0.11.8), and stylelint-scss (6.8.1 → 6.10.0) are appropriate given the PR's objective of fixing ESLint configuration. These are safe patch/minor version updates. Also applies to: 54-54, 58-58 ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about the ESLint configuration and its usage in the codebase. Let me check the ESLint configuration file that was referenced in the webpack configuration. ESLint configuration update is safe and properly integrated The verification confirms that:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ESLint configuration and dependencies
# Check for presence of ESLint config files
echo "ESLint configuration files:"
fd -e js -e json -e yaml -e yml --exec grep -l "eslint" {}
# Check if the project uses neostandard configuration
echo "\nNeostandard configuration:"
jq 'select(.eslintConfig, .standard)' package.json
# List all eslint plugins and configs
echo "\nESLint related packages:"
jq '.devDependencies | with_entries(select(.key | contains("eslint")))' package.json
Length of output: 596 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check ESLint configuration in webpack and any .eslintrc files
echo "ESLint configuration in webpack:"
cat config/webpack/development.js | grep -A 10 "eslint"
echo "\nChecking for .eslintrc files:"
fd -e json -e js -e yaml -e yml -e cjs --exec grep -l "eslintrc" {}
echo "\nChecking package.json for ESLint configuration:"
jq '.eslintConfig' package.json
# Check if there are any ESLint disable comments that might be affected
echo "\nFiles with ESLint disable comments:"
rg "eslint-disable" -l
Length of output: 1131 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check the flat config file mentioned in webpack config
echo "ESLint flat configuration:"
cat eslint.config.mjs
# Check for any recent changes to ESLint configuration
echo "\nRecent changes to ESLint related files:"
git diff HEAD~1 eslint.config.mjs package.json
# Check the actual version constraints in package.json
echo "\nESLint version in package.json:"
jq '.devDependencies.eslint' package.json
Length of output: 2550 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 11959388192Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Ref: webpack-contrib/eslint-webpack-plugin#263
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores