Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vendor: remove vendor ;) #5856

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

stevvooe
Copy link
Contributor

@stevvooe stevvooe commented Feb 21, 2025

The current vendoring setup makes it difficult for new developers to get started on the repository. It seems to be this way to address the problems with adoption across the Docker and Moby repositories. At this point, many of those issues seem to be behind us so it's worth a try again to make this project simpler to work on.

- What I did

Removed vendoring. I did it with a hammer, so we might need to make some repairs.

- How I did it

With a hammer. 🔨

- How to verify it

We should see CI build as normal. Downstream tests, such as moby, should pass as normal.

There were some areas that were using the term "vendor" in a plugin context. We should see NO regressions in that behavior.

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

image

@stevvooe stevvooe requested review from thaJeztah and a team as code owners February 21, 2025 18:13
@stevvooe
Copy link
Contributor Author

We might want to include #4228 as part of this.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 59.27%. Comparing base (77a8a8c) to head (4fd1866).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5856      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.30%   59.27%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         353      353              
  Lines       29694    29694              
==========================================
- Hits        17609    17601       -8     
- Misses      11104    11113       +9     
+ Partials      981      980       -1     

Copy link
Member

@thaJeztah thaJeztah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not LGTM - this breaks the release pipeline, among others.

@stevvooe
Copy link
Contributor Author

this breaks the release pipeline, among others.

Ok, how do we do this so it doesn't break the release pipeline?

The current vendoring setup makes it difficult for new developers to get
started on the repository. It seems to be this way to address the
problems with adoption across the Docker and Moby repositories. At this
point, many of those issues seem to be behind us so it's worth a try
again to make this project simpler to work on.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Day <[email protected]>
@stevvooe stevvooe force-pushed the sjd/remove-vendoring branch from f77c758 to 4fd1866 Compare February 21, 2025 18:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants