Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci(docker): sync dojo base image with build #2966

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 29, 2025
Merged

ci(docker): sync dojo base image with build #2966

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 29, 2025

Conversation

steebchen
Copy link
Member

@steebchen steebchen commented Jan 29, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated base Docker image from Debian Bookworm to Debian Buster for the build process.
    • Removed the inclusion of the saya binary from the final Docker image artifacts.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@steebchen has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8996c86 and b1143c7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Dockerfile (2 hunks)

Walkthrough

Ohayo, sensei! The pull request modifies the Dockerfile by changing the base image for both the builder and base stages from debian:bookworm-slim to debian:buster-slim. This alteration affects the environment in which the build process occurs, potentially impacting the available packages and dependencies. The commands for installing packages and building the application remain unchanged, ensuring that the overall structure and intended functionality of the Dockerfile are preserved.

Changes

File Change Summary
Dockerfile Updated base images from debian:bookworm-slim to debian:buster-slim for both builder and base stages.
.github/Dockerfile Removed line that copies the saya binary from the builder stage to the final image.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • kariy

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bc88734 and d65cc61.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: docs
  • GitHub Check: ensure-wasm
  • GitHub Check: clippy
  • GitHub Check: publish
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Dockerfile (2)

1-1: Version mismatch between builder and base stages could lead to issues.

The builder stage uses Buster while the base stage uses Bookworm. This version mismatch might cause compatibility issues with shared libraries, especially for the copied curtail binary.

Let's verify the shared library dependencies:

Also applies to: 14-14


Line range hint 1-14: Ohayo sensei! Could you share the motivation behind this change?

Understanding the reason for downgrading from Bookworm to Buster would help evaluate if there are alternative solutions that maintain a more up-to-date and secure base image.

Let's check if there are any known issues with building Infinite-File-Curtailer on Bookworm:

Dockerfile Outdated
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
FROM debian:bookworm-slim as builder
FROM debian:buster-slim as builder
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Ohayo sensei! The version downgrade raises significant concerns.

Comparing package versions between Buster and Bookworm:

  • libtool: 2.4.6 -> 2.4.7 (missing security fixes)
  • automake: 1.16.1 -> 1.16.5 (missing improvements)
  • autoconf: 2.69 -> 2.71 (missing major version features)

Additionally:

  • Debian Buster reaches end-of-life in June 2024
  • Using different Debian versions (Buster/Bookworm) between stages could cause compatibility issues with shared libraries

Consider keeping Bookworm in both stages for consistency and security.

🔗 Analysis chain

Ohayo sensei! Consider the implications of downgrading to Debian Buster.

The change from Bookworm (Debian 12) to Buster (Debian 10) for the builder stage raises some concerns:

  • Debian Buster is approaching end-of-life (June 2024)
  • May have outdated packages and security vulnerabilities
  • Reduced package availability compared to Bookworm

Let's check the available package versions in both distributions:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare package versions between Buster and Bookworm
# for the tools we're installing

echo "Checking Buster versions..."
curl -s https://packages.debian.org/buster/libtool | grep -o "libtool.*"
curl -s https://packages.debian.org/buster/automake | grep -o "automake.*"
curl -s https://packages.debian.org/buster/autoconf | grep -o "autoconf.*"

echo -e "\nChecking Bookworm versions..."
curl -s https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/libtool | grep -o "libtool.*"
curl -s https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/automake | grep -o "automake.*"
curl -s https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/autoconf | grep -o "autoconf.*"

Length of output: 18514

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 57.20%. Comparing base (bc88734) to head (b1143c7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2966   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   57.20%   57.20%           
=======================================
  Files         423      423           
  Lines       56125    56125           
=======================================
+ Hits        32104    32105    +1     
+ Misses      24021    24020    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
Dockerfile (1)

1-1: ⚠️ Potential issue

Ohayo sensei! The downgrade to Debian Buster raises significant concerns.

The change from Bookworm to Buster is concerning because:

  • Debian Buster reaches end-of-life in June 2024
  • Contains older versions of critical build tools with known security fixes missing

Let's verify the impact on build dependencies:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the required package versions are available in Buster
curl -s "https://packages.debian.org/buster/libtool" | grep -o "Version:.*"
curl -s "https://packages.debian.org/buster/automake" | grep -o "Version:.*"
curl -s "https://packages.debian.org/buster/autoconf" | grep -o "Version:.*"
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Dockerfile (1)

17-17: Ohayo sensei! Using consistent Debian versions is recommended.

Using different Debian versions between stages could lead to compatibility issues with shared libraries. Consider keeping Bookworm in both stages for consistency and long-term maintainability.

Let's verify if there are any shared library dependencies between stages:

#!/bin/bash
# Check shared library dependencies for curtail binary
ldd /usr/local/bin/curtail
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d65cc61 and 0abce71.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Dockerfile (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: clippy
  • GitHub Check: docs
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: ensure-wasm
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Dockerfile (1)

Line range hint 1-33: Ohayo sensei! Please provide rationale for the downgrade.

The change from Bookworm to Buster appears to be a significant downgrade without clear justification. If there are specific compatibility requirements necessitating this change, please document them.

@steebchen steebchen changed the title ci(docker): adapt dojo base image ci(docker): sync dojo base image with build Jan 29, 2025
@glihm glihm merged commit 38d22ac into main Jan 29, 2025
16 checks passed
@glihm glihm deleted the ci/dockoer branch January 29, 2025 16:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants