-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 192
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci(docker): sync dojo base image with build #2966
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@steebchen has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughOhayo, sensei! The pull request modifies the Dockerfile by changing the base image for both the builder and base stages from Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Dockerfile
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: docs
- GitHub Check: ensure-wasm
- GitHub Check: clippy
- GitHub Check: publish
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Dockerfile (2)
1-1
: Version mismatch between builder and base stages could lead to issues.The builder stage uses Buster while the base stage uses Bookworm. This version mismatch might cause compatibility issues with shared libraries, especially for the copied
curtail
binary.Let's verify the shared library dependencies:
Also applies to: 14-14
Line range hint
1-14
: Ohayo sensei! Could you share the motivation behind this change?Understanding the reason for downgrading from Bookworm to Buster would help evaluate if there are alternative solutions that maintain a more up-to-date and secure base image.
Let's check if there are any known issues with building Infinite-File-Curtailer on Bookworm:
Dockerfile
Outdated
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
FROM debian:bookworm-slim as builder | |||
FROM debian:buster-slim as builder |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Ohayo sensei! The version downgrade raises significant concerns.
Comparing package versions between Buster and Bookworm:
- libtool: 2.4.6 -> 2.4.7 (missing security fixes)
- automake: 1.16.1 -> 1.16.5 (missing improvements)
- autoconf: 2.69 -> 2.71 (missing major version features)
Additionally:
- Debian Buster reaches end-of-life in June 2024
- Using different Debian versions (Buster/Bookworm) between stages could cause compatibility issues with shared libraries
Consider keeping Bookworm in both stages for consistency and security.
🔗 Analysis chain
Ohayo sensei! Consider the implications of downgrading to Debian Buster.
The change from Bookworm (Debian 12) to Buster (Debian 10) for the builder stage raises some concerns:
- Debian Buster is approaching end-of-life (June 2024)
- May have outdated packages and security vulnerabilities
- Reduced package availability compared to Bookworm
Let's check the available package versions in both distributions:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare package versions between Buster and Bookworm
# for the tools we're installing
echo "Checking Buster versions..."
curl -s https://packages.debian.org/buster/libtool | grep -o "libtool.*"
curl -s https://packages.debian.org/buster/automake | grep -o "automake.*"
curl -s https://packages.debian.org/buster/autoconf | grep -o "autoconf.*"
echo -e "\nChecking Bookworm versions..."
curl -s https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/libtool | grep -o "libtool.*"
curl -s https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/automake | grep -o "automake.*"
curl -s https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/autoconf | grep -o "autoconf.*"
Length of output: 18514
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2966 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 57.20% 57.20%
=======================================
Files 423 423
Lines 56125 56125
=======================================
+ Hits 32104 32105 +1
+ Misses 24021 24020 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
Dockerfile (1)
1-1
:⚠️ Potential issueOhayo sensei! The downgrade to Debian Buster raises significant concerns.
The change from Bookworm to Buster is concerning because:
- Debian Buster reaches end-of-life in June 2024
- Contains older versions of critical build tools with known security fixes missing
Let's verify the impact on build dependencies:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the required package versions are available in Buster curl -s "https://packages.debian.org/buster/libtool" | grep -o "Version:.*" curl -s "https://packages.debian.org/buster/automake" | grep -o "Version:.*" curl -s "https://packages.debian.org/buster/autoconf" | grep -o "Version:.*"
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Dockerfile (1)
17-17
: Ohayo sensei! Using consistent Debian versions is recommended.Using different Debian versions between stages could lead to compatibility issues with shared libraries. Consider keeping Bookworm in both stages for consistency and long-term maintainability.
Let's verify if there are any shared library dependencies between stages:
#!/bin/bash # Check shared library dependencies for curtail binary ldd /usr/local/bin/curtail
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Dockerfile
(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: clippy
- GitHub Check: docs
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: ensure-wasm
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint
1-33
: Ohayo sensei! Please provide rationale for the downgrade.The change from Bookworm to Buster appears to be a significant downgrade without clear justification. If there are specific compatibility requirements necessitating this change, please document them.
Summary by CodeRabbit
saya
binary from the final Docker image artifacts.