-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release/9.0] Don't throw exception for parameters with custom binding source #59533
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
requested review from
captainsafia and
a team
as code owners
December 18, 2024 01:08
dotnet-issue-labeler
bot
added
the
area-mvc
Includes: MVC, Actions and Controllers, Localization, CORS, most templates
label
Dec 18, 2024
captainsafia
added
Servicing-consider
Shiproom approval is required for the issue
feature-openapi
labels
Dec 18, 2024
dotnet-policy-service
bot
added
the
pending-ci-rerun
When assigned to a PR indicates that the CI checks should be rerun
label
Dec 26, 2024
/azp run |
dotnet-policy-service
bot
removed
the
pending-ci-rerun
When assigned to a PR indicates that the CI checks should be rerun
label
Jan 9, 2025
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 3 pipeline(s). |
/azp run |
Approved via email. |
captainsafia
added
Servicing-approved
Shiproom has approved the issue
and removed
Servicing-consider
Shiproom approval is required for the issue
labels
Jan 10, 2025
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 3 pipeline(s). |
@BrennanConroy @mikekistler Can I get a review on this backport PR? |
mikekistler
approved these changes
Jan 10, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! 👍
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
area-mvc
Includes: MVC, Actions and Controllers, Localization, CORS, most templates
feature-openapi
Servicing-approved
Shiproom has approved the issue
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport of #59035 to release/9.0
/cc @captainsafia
Description
This change ensures that parameters with custom binding sources do not throw exceptions. Users will need to set the parameter location themselves via transformers, as this information cannot be determined implicitly. Additionally, if users want to specify a custom binder for a parameter from the body, they must define the binding source correctly on the model binder to ensure the argument appears under the requestBody field of the operation instead of the parameters field.
Fixes #59013
Customer Impact
No accessible workarounds are available for this change. This impacts APIs that use third-party packages which implement custom model binding rules for parameters sourced from the request's URL route, like Oqtane and Asp.Versioning.
Regression?
Risk
Medium risk because change is localized to:
But change is technically a breaking behavioral change.
Verification
Packaging changes reviewed?