Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build for profile release-with-debug #113

Open
wants to merge 17 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mikehaller
Copy link

@mikehaller mikehaller commented Dec 5, 2024

A build workflow for the release-with-debug profile, which creates a databroker binary with debug symbols enabled.
This is useful for the integration into an eBPF-based performance test environments.

As separate testers would need to rebuild databroker with that profile, which requires them to set up their own databroker development environment, we've decided for convenience to release debug versions of databroker for exactly that use case.

The additional debugsymbols.txt file in the archive contains the entry point for eBPF probes to instrument the function within databroker where the VSS Signals are being updated by providers:

DatabaseWriteAccess.update()

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 33.33333% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 59.59%. Comparing base (0af4e2c) to head (0a79550).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
databroker/src/broker.rs 33.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #113      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.59%   59.59%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          33       33              
  Lines       16068    16069       +1     
==========================================
  Hits         9576     9576              
- Misses       6492     6493       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@SebastianSchildt
Copy link
Contributor

Like the idea. I noticed there are some .devcontainer configs not previously there. If they are not part/required for this feature, maybe this is something for a separate PR?

@SebastianSchildt
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants