-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Port 50R1 science contribution #59
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…te_wam_bathymetry_swldissip: 1) boost obstruction for high res to compensate for lack on resolution in subgrid data, 2) activate new swell dissip term to 50%
…XCEPT sbottom [sdice scales all previous source terms by ice cover beta]
…oved from SDICE to IMPLSCH and given switch LCISCAL
…ice: scattering, bottom friction & viscous friction
…ice: scattering, bottom friction & viscous friction
… which was probably much thicker than the values CITHICK is giving
…pletely handled within SDICE1
…in implsch and are reset at restarts...
…rue, but also in MICEP)
…tional remove NEMOSST from coupler Ensure ibrmem is initialised. declare NFIELD higher debug debug debug: remove hard coded adjustment to NEMOSST debug: use NEMOCICOVER to deallocate NEMO2WAM
Hi Ahmad, |
Thanks for the feedback Jean! develop-1.4 will now be used to collect changes to 49R2. So changes just for 49R2 can go just there, if we decide to include it in 50R1 then we would simply cherry-pick those commits onto develop. |
@cxzk were you able to run this branch through the CI again to confirm that it is bitid? @jkousal32 could you also please take a look at this PR? |
Trying to do that now, but I need to re-establish a clean reference first. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All looks great to me, thanks for that!!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this appears to be bit-identical to my temporary 50r1 v8 + IFS-3792 branch, when run in standard IFS experiment configurations, so good to merge from my point of view and I can then switch to using this for the later stages of preparing CY50R1.
Thanks!
Thanks all for the reviews and feedback 🙏 @wdeconinck I have now updated the validation norms for the finer grids, so please merge this once the CI is green again. Could you also please tag this as 1.5.0? |
This PR brings over the 50R1 science contributions pertaining to the wave model.
The following testing has been completed:
@jrbidlot and @jkousal32 could you please review this PR too? Please pay particular focus to the scripts changes, as unlike the source these are not patches directly generated from IFS commits.
The only thing missing in this PR are updates to the validation norms for the finer grids. I will add these as the final step before merging once the PR has been approved.