-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
53bc6cf
commit 736a0ee
Showing
1 changed file
with
57 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ | ||
# data model | ||
|
||
- Preload every teammatch team-event, essentially all the quant data we want to collect. | ||
- Then, we can have lists of what data exists, what doesn't, what we missed, etc. | ||
- You'll just need to filter out TeamMatches that has nulls for certain fields. | ||
|
||
# prep builder | ||
|
||
- Prep Builder is for calculations, tableau is for visualization | ||
- This year we _should_ use prep builder for all calculations | ||
|
||
# event state | ||
|
||
- match list | ||
- livestream url, statbotics, ec | ||
|
||
# superscouting | ||
|
||
- There are several benefits to having superscouting integrated with the scouting system | ||
- Integrated with tableau and all the rest of our data | ||
- There are practically no downsides because we can fallback on spreadsheets | ||
|
||
# defense | ||
|
||
- Look at every instance of defense | ||
- Use mutally defended robots as a proxy for direct comparisons | ||
- Looking at how effected both defended robots and defensive robots were when defending / being defended | ||
- We should ask skyehawk | ||
- defender; defended; effectiveness (0, 1, 2) | ||
- how to track this how to figure out defended? | ||
- maybe list them form offenseive? | ||
- dual value decomp? | ||
- pairwise only works when there is 0 or 1 comparisons between teams. | ||
- If there is more then one with the current system the previous comparison is thrown out in favor of the "lastest" | ||
|
||
# pairwise | ||
|
||
- Defense comparisons don't work out | ||
- You would need a scout to always scout defense robots for this to work, so it's the job of a qual scout | ||
- Watch out for null comparisons | ||
- It's not a magic bullet | ||
- Last year we were often vibes-based because we didn't have data | ||
- Pairwise is a good way of getting away from that | ||
- "Value contributed to an alliance" as a metric | ||
|
||
- Comparing defensive robots with offensive robots might not be feasible for quant scouts | ||
|
||
# pit display | ||
|
||
- Blaze could work on this | ||
- Considerably more complex than hensight | ||
|
||
# pit scouting | ||
|
||
- Maybe weight | ||
- We're leaning towards just photos | ||
- Toggle what robots can and can't do throughout the event (TeamEvent data) |