Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor/style(pmd): remove enforcement for control statement braces in single-line statements #5

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

Baconing
Copy link
Member

@Baconing Baconing commented Sep 30, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated ruleset configuration to exclude the ControlStatementBraces rule, allowing more flexibility in control statement formatting.

@Baconing Baconing added the Kind/Enhancement Improve existing functionality label Sep 30, 2024
@Baconing Baconing added this to the Version: 2025-1.0.0 milestone Sep 30, 2024
@Baconing Baconing requested a review from Trip-kun September 30, 2024 20:27
@Baconing Baconing self-assigned this Sep 30, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes made involve updating the pmd.xml configuration file to exclude the ControlStatementBraces rule from the ruleset that references rulesets/java/quickstart.xml. This modification alters the enforcement of control statement brace usage without affecting the overall structure of the XML.

Changes

File Change Summary
pmd.xml Exclusion added for the ControlStatementBraces rule in the ruleset.

Poem

In the garden where rules grow tall,
A rabbit hops, heeding the call.
With braces now set free to roam,
Control statements find a new home.
Hooray for changes, bright and spry,
A hop, a skip, as we say goodbye! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9c53720 and b06b474.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pmd.xml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pmd.xml (1)

12-14: LGTM: Rule exclusion aligns with PR objective.

The exclusion of the "ControlStatementBraces" rule from the Java quickstart ruleset aligns with the PR objective to remove enforcement for control statement braces in single-line statements. This change will allow for more concise code in cases where single-line control statements are used without braces.

However, it's important to note that this change may impact code readability and consistency across the project. While it offers more flexibility, it could lead to potential issues if not used judiciously.

To assess the impact of this change on the existing codebase, you may want to run the following script:

This script will help identify existing instances in the codebase where this new rule might apply, allowing you to review and ensure they align with your coding standards.

✅ Verification successful

Verified: No existing single-line control statements without braces found.

The exclusion of the "ControlStatementBraces" rule does not impact the current codebase, as there are no single-line control statements without braces. Therefore, the change is safe to proceed.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for single-line control statements without braces in the Java codebase

# Search for single-line if, for, while, and do-while statements without braces
echo "Checking for single-line control statements without braces:"
rg --type java '(if|for|while|do)\s*\([^)]+\)\s*[^{;]+;'

echo "Note: Review these occurrences to ensure they align with your coding standards and don't introduce potential issues."

Length of output: 433


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Baconing Baconing merged commit 3e72f2e into master Sep 30, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@Baconing Baconing deleted the v2025-1-0-0/pmd-no-control-statement-braces branch September 30, 2024 20:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Kind/Enhancement Improve existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant