MLPerf4.1-v4.3.1 기준 ref (정답지) 생성용PR #91
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MLPerf4.1-v4.3.1 기준 ref (정답지) 생성용PR
|
/test |
|
https://github.com/furiosa-ai/inference/actions/runs/10732350208 JSON Content:bert_compare_result_int8.json: [
{
"index": 0,
"status": "PASS",
"inp_text": "what tool has measured the amount of dust that travels from the sahara to the amazon? nasa's calipso satellite has measured the amount of dust transported by wind from the sahara to the amazon : an average 182 million tons of dust are windblown out of the sahara each year, at 15 degrees west longitude, across 1, 600 miles ( 2, 600 km ) over the atlantic ocean ( some dust falls into the atlantic ), then at 35 degrees west longitude at the eastern coast of south america, 27. 7 million tons ( 15 % ) of dust fall over the amazon basin, 132 million tons of dust remain in the air, 43 million tons of dust are windblown and falls on the caribbean sea, past 75 degrees west longitude.",
"generated_sentence": "calipso satellite"
}
]bert_f1_score_int8.json: {
"date": "2024-09-06 04:33:26",
"count": 100,
"f1_score": 94.86666666666667,
"reference_f1_score": 94.86666,
}
bert_compare_result_fp8.json: [
{
"index": 0,
"status": "PASS",
"inp_text": "what tool has measured the amount of dust that travels from the sahara to the amazon? nasa's calipso satellite has measured the amount of dust transported by wind from the sahara to the amazon : an average 182 million tons of dust are windblown out of the sahara each year, at 15 degrees west longitude, across 1, 600 miles ( 2, 600 km ) over the atlantic ocean ( some dust falls into the atlantic ), then at 35 degrees west longitude at the eastern coast of south america, 27. 7 million tons ( 15 % ) of dust fall over the amazon basin, 132 million tons of dust remain in the air, 43 million tons of dust are windblown and falls on the caribbean sea, past 75 degrees west longitude.",
"generated_sentence": "calipso satellite"
}
]bert_f1_score_fp8.json: {
"date": "2024-09-06 04:36:01",
"count": 100,
"f1_score": 95.46666666666665,
"reference_f1_score": 95.46667,
}
qgpt_j_compare_result_int8.json: qgpt_j_compare_result_fp8.json: llama2-70b_compare_result_int8.json: [
{
"index": 0,
"status": "DIFFERENT",
"reference_sentence": "Sure, I can help you with that.\n\nThe given sentence is: \"A woman with a fairy tattoo on her back is carrying a purse with a red floral print.\"\n\nTo answer the question, we need to analyze the given sentence and break it down into smaller parts.\n\n1. \"A woman with a fairy tattoo on her back\" - This part of the sentence describes the woman's appearance, and it does not directly relate to the purse.\n2. \"carrying a purse\" - This part of the sentence indicates that the woman is holding a purse.\n3. \"with a red floral print\" - This part of the sentence describes the purse, and it does not directly relate to the woman's appearance.\n\nNow, let's analyze the question: \"The woman's purse has red flowers on it.\"\n\nThe question directly relates to the purse, which is mentioned in the third part of the sentence. However, the sentence does not directly state that the purse has red flowers on it. Instead, it states that the purse has a red floral print.\n\nTo answer the question accurately, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it. Instead, we can conclude that the purse has a red floral print.\n\nSo, the answer to the question is: No, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is: No, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is: No, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: Yes, the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: Yes, the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: It is not possible to tell.\n\nThe correct answer is not: No, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: No, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: It is not possible to tell.\n\nThe correct answer is not: No, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: Yes, the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: It is not possible to tell.\n\nThe correct answer is not: No, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: Yes, the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: It is not possible to tell.\n\nThe correct answer is not: No, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: Yes, the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: It is not possible to tell.\n\nThe correct answer is not: No, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: Yes, the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: It is not possible to tell.\n\nThe correct answer is not: No, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: Yes, the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: It is not possible to tell.\n\nThe correct answer is not: No, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: Yes, the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: It is not possible to tell.\n\nThe correct answer is not: No, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: Yes, the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: It is not possible to tell.\n\nThe correct answer is not: No, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: Yes, the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe correct answer is not: It is not possible to tell.\n\nThe correct answer is not: No, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n",
"generated_sentence": "To answer this question, we need to analyze the given sentence and determine if it provides enough information to support the conclusion that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe sentence \"A woman with a fairy tattoo on her back is carrying a purse with a red floral print\" contains two parts:\n\n1. The woman has a fairy tattoo on her back.\n2. The woman is carrying a purse with a red floral print.\n\nFrom the first part, we can infer that the woman has a tattoo on her back, but we cannot deduce any information about her purse from this part.\n\nFrom the second part, we know that the woman is carrying a purse with a red floral print. However, this part does not explicitly mention anything about red flowers on the purse.\n\nNow, let's consider the possible interpretations of the phrase \"red floral print\":\n\n1. The print could be a pattern of red flowers on the purse.\n2. The print could be a red background with floral patterns (not necessarily flowers) on the purse.\n3. The print could be a red floral pattern that does not include actual flowers, but rather a design that incorporates red and floral elements.\n\nGiven these possibilities, we cannot conclusively say that the woman's purse has red flowers on it. The sentence does not provide enough information to support this conclusion. Therefore, the answer is:\n\n2. It is not possible to tell.\n\nIn summary, the sentence does not explicitly mention red flowers on the purse, and the phrase \"red floral print\" can be interpreted in various ways that do not necessarily include red flowers. Therefore, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.",
"differences": "--- +++ @@ -1,14 +1,36 @@ -Sure, -I -can -help -you -with -that. -The +To +answer +this +question, +we +need +to +analyze +the given sentence -is: +and +determine +if +it +provides +enough +information +to +support +the +conclusion +that +the +woman's +purse +has +red +flowers +on +it. +The +sentence \"A woman with @@ -26,158 +48,230 @@ a red floral -print.\" -To -answer -the -question, -we -need -to -analyze -the -given -sentence -and -break -it -down -into -smaller -parts. +print\" +contains +two +parts: 1. -\"A -woman -with +The +woman +has a fairy tattoo on her -back\" -- -This +back. +2. +The +woman +is +carrying +a +purse +with +a +red +floral +print. +From +the +first +part, +we +can +infer +that +the +woman +has +a +tattoo +on +her +back, +but +we +cannot +deduce +any +information +about +her +purse +from +this +part. +From +the +second +part, +we +know +that +the +woman +is +carrying +a +purse +with +a +red +floral +print. +However, +this part +does +not +explicitly +mention +anything +about +red +flowers +on +the +purse. +Now, +let's +consider +the +possible +interpretations of the -sentence -describes -the -woman's -appearance, -and -it -does -not -directly -relate -to +phrase +\"red +floral +print\": +1. +The +print +could +be +a +pattern +of +red +flowers +on the purse. 2. -\"carrying -a -purse\" -- -This -part -of -the -sentence -indicates -that -the -woman -is -holding -a +The +print +could +be +a +red +background +with +floral +patterns +(not +necessarily +flowers) +on +the purse. 3. -\"with -a -red -floral -print\" -- -This -part -of -the -sentence -describes +The +print +could +be +a +red +floral +pattern +that +does +not +include +actual +flowers, +but +rather +a +design +that +incorporates +red +and +floral +elements. +Given +these +possibilities, +we +cannot +conclusively +say +that +the +woman's +purse +has +red +flowers +on +it. +The +sentence +does +not +provide +enough +information +to +support +this +conclusion. +Therefore, +the +answer +is: +2. +It +is +not +possible +to +tell. +In +summary, +the +sentence +does +not +explicitly +mention +red +flowers +on the purse, and -it -does -not -directly -relate -to -the -woman's -appearance. -Now, -let's -analyze -the -question: -\"The -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it.\" -The -question -directly -relates -to -the -purse, -which -is -mentioned +the +phrase +\"red +floral +print\" +can +be +interpreted in -the -third -part -of -the -sentence. -However, -the -sentence -does -not -directly -state -that -the -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -Instead, -it -states -that -the -purse -has -a -red -floral -print. -To -answer -the -question -accurately, +various +ways +that +do +not +necessarily +include +red +flowers. +Therefore, we cannot conclude @@ -190,517 +284,3 @@ flowers on it. -Instead, -we -can -conclude -that -the -purse -has -a -red -floral -print. -So, -the -answer -to -the -question -is: -No, -we -cannot -conclude -that -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is: -No, -we -cannot -conclude -that -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is: -No, -we -cannot -conclude -that -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -Yes, -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -Yes, -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -It -is -not -possible -to -tell. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -No, -we -cannot -conclude -that -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -No, -we -cannot -conclude -that -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -It -is -not -possible -to -tell. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -No, -we -cannot -conclude -that -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -Yes, -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -It -is -not -possible -to -tell. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -No, -we -cannot -conclude -that -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -Yes, -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -It -is -not -possible -to -tell. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -No, -we -cannot -conclude -that -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -Yes, -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -It -is -not -possible -to -tell. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -No, -we -cannot -conclude -that -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -Yes, -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -It -is -not -possible -to -tell. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -No, -we -cannot -conclude -that -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -Yes, -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -It -is -not -possible -to -tell. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -No, -we -cannot -conclude -that -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -Yes, -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -It -is -not -possible -to -tell. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -No, -we -cannot -conclude -that -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -Yes, -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -It -is -not -possible -to -tell. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -No, -we -cannot -conclude -that -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -Yes, -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -It -is -not -possible -to -tell. -The -correct -answer -is -not: -No, -we -cannot -conclude -that -the -woman's -purse -has -red -flowers -on -it."
}
]llama2-70b_compare_result_fp8.json: |
|
/test |
|
https://github.com/furiosa-ai/inference/actions/runs/10737664048 JSON Content:bert_compare_result_int8.json: [
{
"index": 0,
"status": "PASS",
"inp_text": "what tool has measured the amount of dust that travels from the sahara to the amazon? nasa's calipso satellite has measured the amount of dust transported by wind from the sahara to the amazon : an average 182 million tons of dust are windblown out of the sahara each year, at 15 degrees west longitude, across 1, 600 miles ( 2, 600 km ) over the atlantic ocean ( some dust falls into the atlantic ), then at 35 degrees west longitude at the eastern coast of south america, 27. 7 million tons ( 15 % ) of dust fall over the amazon basin, 132 million tons of dust remain in the air, 43 million tons of dust are windblown and falls on the caribbean sea, past 75 degrees west longitude.",
"generated_sentence": "calipso satellite"
}
]bert_f1_score_int8.json: {
"date": "2024-09-06 11:52:33",
"count": 100,
"f1_score": 94.86666666666667,
"reference_f1_score": 94.86666,
}
bert_compare_result_fp8.json: [
{
"index": 0,
"status": "PASS",
"inp_text": "what tool has measured the amount of dust that travels from the sahara to the amazon? nasa's calipso satellite has measured the amount of dust transported by wind from the sahara to the amazon : an average 182 million tons of dust are windblown out of the sahara each year, at 15 degrees west longitude, across 1, 600 miles ( 2, 600 km ) over the atlantic ocean ( some dust falls into the atlantic ), then at 35 degrees west longitude at the eastern coast of south america, 27. 7 million tons ( 15 % ) of dust fall over the amazon basin, 132 million tons of dust remain in the air, 43 million tons of dust are windblown and falls on the caribbean sea, past 75 degrees west longitude.",
"generated_sentence": "calipso satellite"
}
]bert_f1_score_fp8.json: {
"date": "2024-09-06 11:55:17",
"count": 100,
"f1_score": 95.46666666666665,
"reference_f1_score": 95.46667,
}
qgpt_j_compare_result_int8.json: qgpt_j_compare_result_fp8.json: llama2-70b_compare_result_int8.json: llama2-70b_compare_result_fp8.json: |
|
/test |
|
https://github.com/furiosa-ai/inference/actions/runs/10737954891 JSON Content:bert_compare_result_int8.json: [
{
"index": 0,
"status": "PASS",
"inp_text": "what tool has measured the amount of dust that travels from the sahara to the amazon? nasa's calipso satellite has measured the amount of dust transported by wind from the sahara to the amazon : an average 182 million tons of dust are windblown out of the sahara each year, at 15 degrees west longitude, across 1, 600 miles ( 2, 600 km ) over the atlantic ocean ( some dust falls into the atlantic ), then at 35 degrees west longitude at the eastern coast of south america, 27. 7 million tons ( 15 % ) of dust fall over the amazon basin, 132 million tons of dust remain in the air, 43 million tons of dust are windblown and falls on the caribbean sea, past 75 degrees west longitude.",
"generated_sentence": "calipso satellite"
}
]bert_f1_score_int8.json: {
"date": "2024-09-06 12:16:25",
"count": 100,
"f1_score": 94.86666666666667,
"reference_f1_score": 94.86666,
}
bert_compare_result_fp8.json: [
{
"index": 0,
"status": "PASS",
"inp_text": "what tool has measured the amount of dust that travels from the sahara to the amazon? nasa's calipso satellite has measured the amount of dust transported by wind from the sahara to the amazon : an average 182 million tons of dust are windblown out of the sahara each year, at 15 degrees west longitude, across 1, 600 miles ( 2, 600 km ) over the atlantic ocean ( some dust falls into the atlantic ), then at 35 degrees west longitude at the eastern coast of south america, 27. 7 million tons ( 15 % ) of dust fall over the amazon basin, 132 million tons of dust remain in the air, 43 million tons of dust are windblown and falls on the caribbean sea, past 75 degrees west longitude.",
"generated_sentence": "calipso satellite"
}
]bert_f1_score_fp8.json: {
"date": "2024-09-06 12:19:05",
"count": 100,
"f1_score": 95.46666666666665,
"reference_f1_score": 95.46667,
}
qgpt_j_compare_result_int8.json: qgpt_j_compare_result_fp8.json: llama2-70b_compare_result_int8.json: [
{
"index": 0,
"status": "PASS",
"generated_sentence": "To answer this question, we need to analyze the given sentence and determine if it provides enough information to support the conclusion that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe sentence \"A woman with a fairy tattoo on her back is carrying a purse with a red floral print\" contains two parts:\n\n1. The woman has a fairy tattoo on her back.\n2. The woman is carrying a purse with a red floral print.\n\nFrom the first part, we can infer that the woman has a tattoo on her back, but we cannot deduce any information about her purse from this part.\n\nFrom the second part, we know that the woman is carrying a purse with a red floral print. However, this part does not explicitly mention anything about red flowers on the purse.\n\nNow, let's consider the possible interpretations of the phrase \"red floral print\":\n\n1. The print could be a pattern of red flowers on the purse.\n2. The print could be a red background with floral patterns (not necessarily flowers) on the purse.\n3. The print could be a red floral pattern that does not include actual flowers, but rather a design that incorporates red and floral elements.\n\nGiven these possibilities, we cannot conclusively say that the woman's purse has red flowers on it. The sentence does not provide enough information to support this conclusion. Therefore, the answer is:\n\n2. It is not possible to tell.\n\nIn summary, the sentence does not explicitly mention red flowers on the purse, and the phrase \"red floral print\" can be interpreted in various ways that do not necessarily include red flowers. Therefore, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.",
"reference_sentence": "To answer this question, we need to analyze the given sentence and determine if it provides enough information to support the conclusion that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe sentence \"A woman with a fairy tattoo on her back is carrying a purse with a red floral print\" contains two parts:\n\n1. The woman has a fairy tattoo on her back.\n2. The woman is carrying a purse with a red floral print.\n\nFrom the first part, we can infer that the woman has a tattoo on her back, but we cannot deduce any information about her purse from this part.\n\nFrom the second part, we know that the woman is carrying a purse with a red floral print. However, this part does not explicitly mention anything about red flowers on the purse.\n\nNow, let's consider the possible interpretations of the phrase \"red floral print\":\n\n1. The print could be a pattern of red flowers on the purse.\n2. The print could be a red background with floral patterns (not necessarily flowers) on the purse.\n3. The print could be a red floral pattern that does not include actual flowers, but rather a design that incorporates red and floral elements.\n\nGiven these possibilities, we cannot conclusively say that the woman's purse has red flowers on it. The sentence does not provide enough information to support this conclusion. Therefore, the answer is:\n\n2. It is not possible to tell.\n\nIn summary, the sentence does not explicitly mention red flowers on the purse, and the phrase \"red floral print\" can be interpreted in various ways that do not necessarily include red flowers. Therefore, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it."
}
]llama2-70b_compare_result_fp8.json: |
|
/test |
|
https://github.com/furiosa-ai/inference/actions/runs/10749143808 JSON Content:bert_compare_result_int8.json: [
{
"index": 0,
"status": "PASS",
"inp_text": "what tool has measured the amount of dust that travels from the sahara to the amazon? nasa's calipso satellite has measured the amount of dust transported by wind from the sahara to the amazon : an average 182 million tons of dust are windblown out of the sahara each year, at 15 degrees west longitude, across 1, 600 miles ( 2, 600 km ) over the atlantic ocean ( some dust falls into the atlantic ), then at 35 degrees west longitude at the eastern coast of south america, 27. 7 million tons ( 15 % ) of dust fall over the amazon basin, 132 million tons of dust remain in the air, 43 million tons of dust are windblown and falls on the caribbean sea, past 75 degrees west longitude.",
"generated_sentence": "calipso satellite"
}
]bert_f1_score_int8.json: {
"date": "2024-09-07 06:16:18",
"count": 100,
"f1_score": 94.86666666666667,
"reference_f1_score": 94.86666,
}
bert_compare_result_fp8.json: [
{
"index": 0,
"status": "PASS",
"inp_text": "what tool has measured the amount of dust that travels from the sahara to the amazon? nasa's calipso satellite has measured the amount of dust transported by wind from the sahara to the amazon : an average 182 million tons of dust are windblown out of the sahara each year, at 15 degrees west longitude, across 1, 600 miles ( 2, 600 km ) over the atlantic ocean ( some dust falls into the atlantic ), then at 35 degrees west longitude at the eastern coast of south america, 27. 7 million tons ( 15 % ) of dust fall over the amazon basin, 132 million tons of dust remain in the air, 43 million tons of dust are windblown and falls on the caribbean sea, past 75 degrees west longitude.",
"generated_sentence": "calipso satellite"
}
]bert_f1_score_fp8.json: {
"date": "2024-09-07 06:18:44",
"count": 100,
"f1_score": 95.46666666666665,
"reference_f1_score": 95.46667,
}
qgpt_j_compare_result_int8.json: qgpt_j_compare_result_fp8.json: llama2-70b_compare_result_int8.json: [
{
"index": 0,
"status": "PASS",
"generated_sentence": "To answer this question, we need to analyze the given sentence and determine if it provides enough information to support the conclusion that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe sentence \"A woman with a fairy tattoo on her back is carrying a purse with a red floral print\" contains two parts:\n\n1. The woman has a fairy tattoo on her back.\n2. The woman is carrying a purse with a red floral print.\n\nFrom the first part, we can infer that the woman has a tattoo on her back, but we cannot deduce any information about her purse from this part.\n\nFrom the second part, we know that the woman is carrying a purse with a red floral print. However, this part does not explicitly mention anything about red flowers on the purse.\n\nNow, let's consider the possible interpretations of the phrase \"red floral print\":\n\n1. The print could be a pattern of red flowers on the purse.\n2. The print could be a red background with floral patterns (not necessarily flowers) on the purse.\n3. The print could be a red floral pattern that does not include actual flowers, but rather a design that incorporates red and floral elements.\n\nGiven these possibilities, we cannot conclusively say that the woman's purse has red flowers on it. The sentence does not provide enough information to support this conclusion. Therefore, the answer is:\n\n2. It is not possible to tell.\n\nIn summary, the sentence does not explicitly mention red flowers on the purse, and the phrase \"red floral print\" can be interpreted in various ways that do not necessarily include red flowers. Therefore, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.",
"reference_sentence": "To answer this question, we need to analyze the given sentence and determine if it provides enough information to support the conclusion that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.\n\nThe sentence \"A woman with a fairy tattoo on her back is carrying a purse with a red floral print\" contains two parts:\n\n1. The woman has a fairy tattoo on her back.\n2. The woman is carrying a purse with a red floral print.\n\nFrom the first part, we can infer that the woman has a tattoo on her back, but we cannot deduce any information about her purse from this part.\n\nFrom the second part, we know that the woman is carrying a purse with a red floral print. However, this part does not explicitly mention anything about red flowers on the purse.\n\nNow, let's consider the possible interpretations of the phrase \"red floral print\":\n\n1. The print could be a pattern of red flowers on the purse.\n2. The print could be a red background with floral patterns (not necessarily flowers) on the purse.\n3. The print could be a red floral pattern that does not include actual flowers, but rather a design that incorporates red and floral elements.\n\nGiven these possibilities, we cannot conclusively say that the woman's purse has red flowers on it. The sentence does not provide enough information to support this conclusion. Therefore, the answer is:\n\n2. It is not possible to tell.\n\nIn summary, the sentence does not explicitly mention red flowers on the purse, and the phrase \"red floral print\" can be interpreted in various ways that do not necessarily include red flowers. Therefore, we cannot conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it."
}
] |
|
https://github.com/furiosa-ai/inference/actions/runs/10749143808 JSON Content:llama2-70b_compare_result_fp8.json: [
{
"index": 0,
"status": "PASS",
"generated_sentence": "The given sentence is: \"A woman with a fairy tattoo on her back is carrying a purse with a red floral print.\"\n\nTo conclude that \"The woman's purse has red flowers on it,\" we need to analyze the given sentence carefully.\n\n1. The sentence mentions a woman with a fairy tattoo on her back. This information does not directly relate to the color or design of her purse.\n2. The sentence mentions that the purse has a red floral print. This implies that the purse has a design or pattern featuring red flowers.\n\nNow, let's consider the options:\n\n1. Yes: This option suggests that we can conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it. This is a valid conclusion based on the information provided in the sentence.\n2. It is not possible to tell: This option suggests that we cannot determine whether the woman's purse has red flowers on it or not. However, based on the information provided, we can infer that the purse has a red floral print, which implies that it does have red flowers on it. Therefore, this option is not accurate.\n3. No: This option suggests that the woman's purse does not have red flowers on it. However, this contradicts the information provided in the sentence, which mentions a red floral print on the purse. Therefore, this option is not accurate.\n\nBased on the analysis above, the correct answer is:\n\n1. Yes, we can conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it.",
"reference_sentence": "The given sentence is: \"A woman with a fairy tattoo on her back is carrying a purse with a red floral print.\"\n\nTo conclude that \"The woman's purse has red flowers on it,\" we need to analyze the given sentence carefully.\n\n1. The sentence mentions a woman with a fairy tattoo on her back. This information does not directly relate to the color or design of her purse.\n2. The sentence mentions that the purse has a red floral print. This implies that the purse has a design or pattern featuring red flowers.\n\nNow, let's consider the options:\n\n1. Yes: This option suggests that we can conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it. This is a valid conclusion based on the information provided in the sentence.\n2. It is not possible to tell: This option suggests that we cannot determine whether the woman's purse has red flowers on it or not. However, based on the information provided, we can infer that the purse has a red floral print, which implies that it does have red flowers on it. Therefore, this option is not accurate.\n3. No: This option suggests that the woman's purse does not have red flowers on it. However, this contradicts the information provided in the sentence, which mentions a red floral print on the purse. Therefore, this option is not accurate.\n\nBased on the analysis above, the correct answer is:\n\n1. Yes, we can conclude that the woman's purse has red flowers on it."
}
] |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
MLPerf4.1-v4.3.1 기준 ref (정답지) 생성용PR