Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gh-3091: Improve testing of GafferPop NamedOperationService #3102

Conversation

GCHQDeveloper314
Copy link
Member

@GCHQDeveloper314 GCHQDeveloper314 commented Nov 17, 2023

Includes a fix for missing Generics in the class itself

Related issue

@GCHQDeveloper314 GCHQDeveloper314 changed the title Gh-3090: Improve testing of GafferPop NamedOperationService Gh-3091: Improve testing of GafferPop NamedOperationService Nov 17, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 17, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (fa1bd5a) 65.56% compared to head (a100742) 65.71%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #3102      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      65.56%   65.71%   +0.14%     
+ Complexity      2667     2514     -153     
=============================================
  Files            909      909              
  Lines          29008    29008              
  Branches        3234     3234              
=============================================
+ Hits           19020    19062      +42     
+ Misses          8541     8499      -42     
  Partials        1447     1447              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

t92549
t92549 previously approved these changes Nov 21, 2023
@GCHQDeveloper314 GCHQDeveloper314 merged commit d48db5e into develop Nov 21, 2023
24 checks passed
@GCHQDeveloper314 GCHQDeveloper314 deleted the gh-3090-improve-testing-of-GafferPopNamedOperationService branch November 21, 2023 16:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve testing of GafferPopNamedOperationService
3 participants