Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add clarification on usage #154

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: TC_4.0.1
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

f-peverali
Copy link
Contributor

@f-peverali f-peverali commented Dec 12, 2024

Contributor Pull Request

Description

Klärung der Verwendung von MedicationStatement und MedicationAdministration, um die UCs für die Granularität auf Zeitebene zwischen der Präzision auf Sekunden-Ebene und der auf Datumsebene aufzuteilen.

clarification on usage of MedicationStatement and MedicationAdministration in order do divide UCs for time-level granularity between second-level and date-level precision.

Motivation and Context

solves PTDATA-1367

How has this been tested?

Snippets or Screenshots (if necessary):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this IG / specification.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation or narrative (intend) of the IG.
  • I have already updated the documentation / narrative (intend) accordingly.

Copy link
Contributor

@lhitc lhitc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Die Anpassungen bezüglich effective[x] in M.Administration/M.Statement passen aus meiner Sicht wie besprochen.
Evtl. kann man noch etwas mehr Hintergrund-Erläuterung zu den Argumenten für diese Vorgaben einbringen. Dazu finde ich den Absatz von Felix Erdfelder im Zulip-Thread passend (13.12.2024 10:27, https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/channel/287581-german.2Fisik/topic/.5BMED.5D.20Administration.2FVerabreichung.20-.20Date.20or.20Timestamp/near/488799087 )

@f-peverali
Copy link
Contributor Author

Die Anpassungen bezüglich effective[x] in M.Administration/M.Statement passen aus meiner Sicht wie besprochen. Evtl. kann man noch etwas mehr Hintergrund-Erläuterung zu den Argumenten für diese Vorgaben einbringen. Dazu finde ich den Absatz von Felix Erdfelder im Zulip-Thread passend (13.12.2024 10:27, https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/channel/287581-german.2Fisik/topic/.5BMED.5D.20Administration.2FVerabreichung.20-.20Date.20or.20Timestamp/near/488799087 )

Die entsprechende Begründung ist eingebracht in diesen PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants