Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(Netzentwicklung): use S&K Planer people instead of regions for map styling #1119

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

danji90
Copy link
Contributor

@danji90 danji90 commented Dec 4, 2023

How to

Others

  • It's not a hack or at least an unauthorized hack :).
  • The images added are optimized.
  • Everything in ticket description has been fixed.
  • The author of the MR has made its own review before assigning the reviewer.
  • The title means something for a human being and follows the conventional commits specification.
  • The title contains [WIP] if it's necessary.
  • Labels applied. if it's a release? a hotfix?
  • Tests added.

@danji90 danji90 self-assigned this Dec 4, 2023
@danji90 danji90 marked this pull request as draft December 4, 2023 14:16
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 4, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
dev-trafimage-maps ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 20, 2023 1:55pm
dev-trafimage-maps-update-deps ❌ Failed (Inspect) Dec 20, 2023 1:55pm
trafimage-maps ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 20, 2023 1:55pm
trafimage-maps-update-deps ❌ Failed (Inspect) Dec 20, 2023 1:55pm

@oterral oterral marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2023 10:36
@oterral oterral mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2023
@oterral oterral changed the title fix(Netzentwicklung): use S&K Planer people instead of regions for map styling feat(Netzentwicklung): use S&K Planer people instead of regions for map styling Dec 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants