Update permission interface in order to correctly type abilities. #1001
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/interfaces/permissions.interface.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-14: Consider providing migration documentationThe transition to
MongoAbilityimproves type safety but may require updates in consuming code. Consider:
- Adding migration notes in the README
- Providing examples of updating existing implementations
- Documenting any breaking changes
This will help users smoothly transition to the new typing system.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/interfaces/permissions.interface.ts(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/interfaces/permissions.interface.ts (1)
Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/interfaces/permissions.interface.ts (3)
1-1: LGTM: Import changes align with CASL V6 migration
The addition of MongoAbility import is consistent with the transition from the deprecated Ability interface.
14-14: LGTM: Constructor type alignment
The constructor parameter type update maintains consistency with the class extension change and ensures proper typing throughout.
10-10: Verify impact of stronger type constraints
The transition to MongoAbility<AbilityTuple<Actions, Subjects>> improves type safety but may affect existing implementations.
Let's check for potential breaking changes:
✅ Verification successful
Type change is safe and properly integrated
The change to MongoAbility<AbilityTuple<Actions, Subjects>> is well-integrated across the codebase:
- The
UserAbilityBuilderis only used inability.factory.tswith proper generic type parameters - The codebase already uses
MongoAbilitytypes consistently in related files - The change aligns with existing type usage in
conditions.proxy.tswhich usesAnyMongoAbility
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for existing implementations that might be affected
rg -l "extends UserAbilityBuilder"
# Look for direct usage of the builder class
rg "new UserAbilityBuilder\(" -A 3
Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the usage context
# First, let's find any references to UserAbilityBuilder
rg "UserAbilityBuilder"
# Also search for any class that extends AbilityBuilder
rg "extends AbilityBuilder"
# Let's also check for any usage of MongoAbility
rg "MongoAbility"
# And check for any imports of these types
rg "import.*(?:UserAbilityBuilder|AbilityBuilder|MongoAbility)"
Length of output: 1524
|
Hello, I may be wrong, but @jburkert approved the changes, are we waiting for another approval ? 😄 |
Ability is deprecated, so I updated it to MongoAbility, so ability builder is fully typed as in CASL V6.
Summary by CodeRabbit
MongoAbilitytype for permissions.