Add automation for software engineering process #541
Conversation
test autonomy
|
@Ig0tU is attempting to deploy a commit to the Listinai Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces significant enhancements to the backend application by adding new controllers and services across multiple files. The changes focus on expanding project management, communication, integration, and development workflow capabilities. New methods have been added to controllers like Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant AuthController
participant ProjectManagementService
User->>AuthController: Create Roadmap
AuthController->>ProjectManagementService: createRoadmap()
ProjectManagementService-->>AuthController: Return Roadmap
AuthController-->>User: Respond with Roadmap
User->>AuthController: Create User Story
AuthController->>ProjectManagementService: createUserStory()
ProjectManagementService-->>AuthController: Return User Story
AuthController-->>User: Respond with User Story
Poem
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
apps/backend/src/api/routes/copilot.controller.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-11: Missing import forResponsetypeThe
Responsetype used in your methods is not imported. Add the import statement forResponsefrom theexpressmodule to ensure proper typing.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
import { Logger, Controller, Get, Post, Req, Res, Body } from '@nestjs/common'; +import { Response } from 'express'; import { CopilotRuntime, OpenAIAdapter, copilotRuntimeNestEndpoint, } from '@copilotkit/runtime';
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
apps/backend/src/api/routes/copilot.controller.ts (2)
50-105: Refactor duplicated try-catch blocks in controller methodsThe methods
facilitateCommunication(lines 50-64),generateDocumentation(lines 66-79),integrateSlack(lines 81-92), andintegrateTeams(lines 94-105) contain similar try-catch structures. Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.Here's how you might refactor the error handling:
private async handleRequest( serviceMethod: () => Promise<any>, response: Response ) { try { const result = await serviceMethod(); response.status(200).json(result); } catch (e) { response.status(400).send(e.message); } }Then update your methods:
@Post('/communicate') async facilitateCommunication( @Body() body: { message: string; recipients: string[] }, @Res() response: Response ) { await this.handleRequest( () => this._communicationService.sendMessage(body.message, body.recipients), response ); }
50-105: Consider using NestJS exception filters instead of manual error handlingManually handling errors with
try-catchblocks and sending responses usingresponsecan be repetitive. Consider using NestJS's built-in exception filters or throwing HTTP exceptions to streamline error handling.Example refactored method:
@Post('/communicate') async facilitateCommunication( @Body() body: { message: string; recipients: string[] } ) { return await this._communicationService.sendMessage( body.message, body.recipients ); }Ensure that your service methods throw appropriate HTTP exceptions (e.g.,
BadRequestException,InternalServerErrorException) when errors occur.apps/backend/src/api/routes/posts.controller.ts (1)
147-173: Consistent response handlingThere is inconsistency in response handling across the controller methods. Some methods return values directly, while others use
@Res(). For consistency and to leverage NestJS's automatic response handling, consider removing@Res()where unnecessary and return responses directly.apps/backend/src/api/routes/auth.controller.ts (1)
213-291: Inconsistent response handling with@Res()The use of
@Res()can bypass NestJS's built-in response handling. For cleaner code and to utilize global interceptors and exception filters, consider removing@Res()and returning responses directly.Example refactored method:
@Post('/project-management/create-roadmap') async createRoadmap(@Body() body: CreateRoadmapDto) { return await this._projectManagementService.createRoadmap( body.title, body.description ); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
apps/backend/src/api/routes/auth.controller.ts(2 hunks)apps/backend/src/api/routes/copilot.controller.ts(3 hunks)apps/backend/src/api/routes/integrations.controller.ts(5 hunks)apps/backend/src/api/routes/posts.controller.ts(3 hunks)docker-compose.dev.yaml(1 hunks)setup.sh(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/backend/src/api/routes/posts.controller.ts (1)
147-173:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure authorization checks are in place
The new endpoints perform sensitive operations like code generation and triggering CI/CD pipelines. Verify that appropriate authorization checks are implemented to prevent unauthorized access.
apps/backend/src/api/routes/integrations.controller.ts (3)
47-47: LGTM!The formatting changes and token usage in the setNickname method look good.
Also applies to: 150-153, 158-161
207-209: LGTM!The external URL handling changes look good.
509-512: LGTM!The authentication handling with fixed encryption looks secure.
| @Post('/integrate-slack') | ||
| async integrateSlack( | ||
| @Body() body: { slackToken: string }, | ||
| @Res() response: Response | ||
| ) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const result = await this._communicationService.integrateSlack(body.slackToken); | ||
| response.status(200).json(result); | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| response.status(400).send(e.message); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Post('/integrate-teams') | ||
| async integrateTeams( | ||
| @Body() body: { teamsToken: string }, | ||
| @Res() response: Response | ||
| ) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const result = await this._communicationService.integrateTeams(body.teamsToken); | ||
| response.status(200).json(result); | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| response.status(400).send(e.message); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security concern: Avoid passing tokens directly in request bodies
Passing sensitive tokens like slackToken and teamsToken in the request body can expose them to security risks. Consider implementing OAuth or secure credential storage mechanisms to handle integrations securely.
| @Post('/code-generation') | ||
| async generateCode( | ||
| @GetOrgFromRequest() org: Organization, | ||
| @Body() body: { userStoryId: string } | ||
| ) { | ||
| return this._codeGenerationService.generateCode(org.id, body.userStoryId); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Post('/testing/unit') | ||
| async runUnitTests(@GetOrgFromRequest() org: Organization) { | ||
| return this._testingService.runUnitTests(org.id); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Post('/testing/integration') | ||
| async runIntegrationTests(@GetOrgFromRequest() org: Organization) { | ||
| return this._testingService.runIntegrationTests(org.id); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Post('/testing/e2e') | ||
| async runE2ETests(@GetOrgFromRequest() org: Organization) { | ||
| return this._testingService.runE2ETests(org.id); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Post('/cicd/pipeline') | ||
| async triggerCICDPipeline(@GetOrgFromRequest() org: Organization) { | ||
| return this._cicdService.triggerPipeline(org.id); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling to new methods
The methods generateCode, runUnitTests, runIntegrationTests, runE2ETests, and triggerCICDPipeline lack error handling. This may lead to unhandled promise rejections and unclear error responses to the client. Wrap these methods in try-catch blocks to handle exceptions gracefully.
Example:
@Post('/code-generation')
async generateCode(
@GetOrgFromRequest() org: Organization,
@Body() body: { userStoryId: string }
) {
try {
return await this._codeGenerationService.generateCode(org.id, body.userStoryId);
} catch (e) {
throw new BadRequestException(e.message);
}
}Ensure you import the necessary exceptions from @nestjs/common.
| @Post('/project-management/create-roadmap') | ||
| async createRoadmap( | ||
| @Body() body: { title: string; description: string }, | ||
| @Res() response: Response | ||
| ) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const roadmap = await this._projectManagementService.createRoadmap( | ||
| body.title, | ||
| body.description | ||
| ); | ||
| response.status(201).json(roadmap); | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| response.status(400).send(e.message); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Post('/project-management/create-user-story') | ||
| async createUserStory( | ||
| @Body() body: { roadmapId: string; title: string; description: string }, | ||
| @Res() response: Response | ||
| ) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const userStory = await this._projectManagementService.createUserStory( | ||
| body.roadmapId, | ||
| body.title, | ||
| body.description | ||
| ); | ||
| response.status(201).json(userStory); | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| response.status(400).send(e.message); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Post('/project-management/create-task') | ||
| async createTask( | ||
| @Body() body: { userStoryId: string; title: string; description: string }, | ||
| @Res() response: Response | ||
| ) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const task = await this._projectManagementService.createTask( | ||
| body.userStoryId, | ||
| body.title, | ||
| body.description | ||
| ); | ||
| response.status(201).json(task); | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| response.status(400).send(e.message); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Get('/project-management/track-progress') | ||
| async trackProgress(@Res() response: Response) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const progress = await this._projectManagementService.trackProgress(); | ||
| response.status(200).json(progress); | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| response.status(400).send(e.message); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Get('/project-management/estimate-timelines') | ||
| async estimateTimelines(@Res() response: Response) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const timelines = await this._projectManagementService.estimateTimelines(); | ||
| response.status(200).json(timelines); | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| response.status(400).send(e.message); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Get('/project-management/identify-roadblocks') | ||
| async identifyRoadblocks(@Res() response: Response) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const roadblocks = await this._projectManagementService.identifyRoadblocks(); | ||
| response.status(200).json(roadblocks); | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| response.status(400).send(e.message); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing authentication and authorization on project management endpoints
The newly added project management endpoints (createRoadmap, createUserStory, createTask, trackProgress, estimateTimelines, identifyRoadblocks) do not include any authentication or authorization checks. This could allow unauthorized users to access or manipulate project data.
Consider using guards or decorators to enforce authentication:
@UseGuards(AuthGuard('jwt'))
@Post('/project-management/create-roadmap')
async createRoadmap(/* ... */) { /* ... */ }| @Body() body: { title: string; description: string }, | ||
| @Res() response: Response | ||
| ) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const roadmap = await this._projectManagementService.createRoadmap( | ||
| body.title, | ||
| body.description | ||
| ); | ||
| response.status(201).json(roadmap); | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| response.status(400).send(e.message); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Post('/project-management/create-user-story') | ||
| async createUserStory( | ||
| @Body() body: { roadmapId: string; title: string; description: string }, | ||
| @Res() response: Response | ||
| ) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const userStory = await this._projectManagementService.createUserStory( | ||
| body.roadmapId, | ||
| body.title, | ||
| body.description | ||
| ); | ||
| response.status(201).json(userStory); | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| response.status(400).send(e.message); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Post('/project-management/create-task') | ||
| async createTask( | ||
| @Body() body: { userStoryId: string; title: string; description: string }, | ||
| @Res() response: Response | ||
| ) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const task = await this._projectManagementService.createTask( | ||
| body.userStoryId, | ||
| body.title, | ||
| body.description | ||
| ); | ||
| response.status(201).json(task); | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| response.status(400).send(e.message); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input validation to project management methods
The methods accepting input (createRoadmap, createUserStory, createTask) should validate the incoming data to prevent invalid or malicious input.
Define DTOs with validation decorators:
import { IsString, IsNotEmpty } from 'class-validator';
export class CreateRoadmapDto {
@IsString()
@IsNotEmpty()
title: string;
@IsString()
description: string;
}Update your method to use the DTO:
@Post('/project-management/create-roadmap')
async createRoadmap(
@Body() body: CreateRoadmapDto,
@Res() response: Response
) { /* ... */ }| @Get('/monitor-performance') | ||
| async monitorSystemPerformance(@GetOrgFromRequest() org: Organization) { | ||
| // Add logic to monitor system performance and identify potential issues | ||
| return this._integrationService.monitorSystemPerformance(org.id); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement rate limiting for performance monitoring endpoint
The performance monitoring endpoint should:
- Implement rate limiting to prevent DoS
- Define specific metrics to be monitored
- Add caching for performance data
@Get('/monitor-performance')
+ @UseInterceptors(RateLimitInterceptor)
async monitorSystemPerformance(@GetOrgFromRequest() org: Organization) {
- // Add logic to monitor system performance and identify potential issues
- return this._integrationService.monitorSystemPerformance(org.id);
+ const cacheKey = `performance:${org.id}`;
+ const cached = await this.cacheManager.get(cacheKey);
+ if (cached) return cached;
+
+ const metrics = await this._integrationService.monitorSystemPerformance(org.id);
+ await this.cacheManager.set(cacheKey, metrics, 300);
+ return metrics;
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @Post('/bug-fix') | ||
| async automateBugFixes( | ||
| @GetOrgFromRequest() org: Organization, | ||
| @Body() body: { feedback: string } | ||
| ) { | ||
| // Add logic to automate bug fixes and updates based on user feedback and system logs | ||
| return this._integrationService.automateBugFixes(org.id, body.feedback); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation and sanitization for bug fix automation endpoint
The bug fix automation endpoint needs:
- Input validation for feedback
- Rate limiting for submissions
- Logging of automation attempts
- Clear documentation of the expected feedback format
@Post('/bug-fix')
+ @UseInterceptors(RateLimitInterceptor)
async automateBugFixes(
@GetOrgFromRequest() org: Organization,
- @Body() body: { feedback: string }
+ @Body() body: AutomateBugFixDto
) {
- // Add logic to automate bug fixes and updates based on user feedback and system logs
+ this.logger.info(`Automating bug fix for org ${org.id} with feedback: ${body.feedback}`);
+ try {
+ return await this._integrationService.automateBugFixes(org.id, body.feedback);
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error(`Bug fix automation failed: ${error.message}`);
+ throw new InternalServerErrorException('Failed to automate bug fix');
+ }
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @Post('/deploy') | ||
| async deployToEnvironment( | ||
| @GetOrgFromRequest() org: Organization, | ||
| @Body() body: { environment: string } | ||
| ) { | ||
| // Add logic to automate deployment to various environments | ||
| return this._integrationService.deployToEnvironment(org.id, body.environment); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Review comment is valid and critical
The deployment endpoint lacks essential security measures and implementation:
- No environment validation exists in the codebase
- The service method
deployToEnvironmentis not implemented - No authorization checks are present
- No error handling is implemented
The original review comment correctly identifies critical security concerns that need to be addressed before this endpoint can be safely used.
🔗 Analysis chain
Add input validation and error handling for deployment endpoint
The deployment endpoint needs additional security measures:
- Validate the environment string against allowed values
- Add error handling for deployment failures
- Consider adding role-based access control for deployment operations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if deployment-related permissions are implemented
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements $_ {
$$$
@CheckPolicies([AuthorizationActions.$_, Sections.$_])
$$$
deployToEnvironment($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any decorators in integrations controller
echo "=== Checking decorators ==="
ast-grep --pattern '@$_($$$)
$$$' apps/backend/src/api/routes/integrations.controller.ts
# Look for environment validation
echo "=== Checking environment validation ==="
rg -A 5 "environment.*validation|validateEnvironment" apps/backend/src/api
# Check integration service implementation
echo "=== Checking integration service ==="
fd "integration.service" --type f --exec cat {}
Length of output: 17975
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for environment-related types or enums
echo "=== Checking environment types ==="
rg -g "*.ts" "enum.*Environment|type.*Environment|interface.*Environment"
# Search for environment constants
echo "=== Checking environment constants ==="
rg -g "*.ts" "const.*Environment.*=|export.*Environment.*="
# Check for any existing deployment-related code
echo "=== Checking deployment patterns ==="
rg -g "*.ts" "deploy.*environment|environment.*deploy" -A 3
Length of output: 906
| #!/bin/bash | ||
|
|
||
| # Install necessary dependencies and tools | ||
| echo "Installing necessary dependencies and tools..." | ||
| npm install -g @nestjs/cli | ||
| npm install | ||
|
|
||
| # Set up environment variables and configuration files | ||
| echo "Setting up environment variables and configuration files..." | ||
| cp .env.example .env | ||
|
|
||
| # Launch the project using Docker Compose | ||
| echo "Launching the project using Docker Compose..." | ||
| docker-compose -f docker-compose.dev.yaml up --build |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and prerequisite checks
The setup script needs improvements for reliability:
- Check for required tools (docker, npm)
- Validate environment file copy
- Add error handling
- Implement cleanup on failure
#!/bin/bash
+set -euo pipefail
+
+# Function to check prerequisites
+check_prerequisites() {
+ command -v docker >/dev/null 2>&1 || { echo "Docker is required but not installed. Aborting." >&2; exit 1; }
+ command -v npm >/dev/null 2>&1 || { echo "npm is required but not installed. Aborting." >&2; exit 1; }
+}
+
+# Function to clean up on failure
+cleanup() {
+ echo "Setup failed. Cleaning up..."
+ docker-compose -f docker-compose.dev.yaml down
+ exit 1
+}
+
+# Set up error handling
+trap cleanup ERR
+
+# Check prerequisites
+check_prerequisites
# Install necessary dependencies and tools
echo "Installing necessary dependencies and tools..."
npm install -g @nestjs/cli
-npm install
+npm install || { echo "Failed to install dependencies. Aborting." >&2; exit 1; }
# Set up environment variables and configuration files
echo "Setting up environment variables and configuration files..."
-cp .env.example .env
+if [ ! -f .env.example ]; then
+ echo ".env.example not found. Aborting." >&2
+ exit 1
+fi
+cp .env.example .env || { echo "Failed to create .env file. Aborting." >&2; exit 1; }
# Launch the project using Docker Compose
echo "Launching the project using Docker Compose..."
-docker-compose -f docker-compose.dev.yaml up --build
+docker-compose -f docker-compose.dev.yaml up --build || cleanup📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| #!/bin/bash | |
| # Install necessary dependencies and tools | |
| echo "Installing necessary dependencies and tools..." | |
| npm install -g @nestjs/cli | |
| npm install | |
| # Set up environment variables and configuration files | |
| echo "Setting up environment variables and configuration files..." | |
| cp .env.example .env | |
| # Launch the project using Docker Compose | |
| echo "Launching the project using Docker Compose..." | |
| docker-compose -f docker-compose.dev.yaml up --build | |
| #!/bin/bash | |
| set -euo pipefail | |
| # Function to check prerequisites | |
| check_prerequisites() { | |
| command -v docker >/dev/null 2>&1 || { echo "Docker is required but not installed. Aborting." >&2; exit 1; } | |
| command -v npm >/dev/null 2>&1 || { echo "npm is required but not installed. Aborting." >&2; exit 1; } | |
| } | |
| # Function to clean up on failure | |
| cleanup() { | |
| echo "Setup failed. Cleaning up..." | |
| docker-compose -f docker-compose.dev.yaml down | |
| exit 1 | |
| } | |
| # Set up error handling | |
| trap cleanup ERR | |
| # Check prerequisites | |
| check_prerequisites | |
| # Install necessary dependencies and tools | |
| echo "Installing necessary dependencies and tools..." | |
| npm install -g @nestjs/cli | |
| npm install || { echo "Failed to install dependencies. Aborting." >&2; exit 1; } | |
| # Set up environment variables and configuration files | |
| echo "Setting up environment variables and configuration files..." | |
| if [ ! -f .env.example ]; then | |
| echo ".env.example not found. Aborting." >&2 | |
| exit 1 | |
| fi | |
| cp .env.example .env || { echo "Failed to create .env file. Aborting." >&2; exit 1; } | |
| # Launch the project using Docker Compose | |
| echo "Launching the project using Docker Compose..." | |
| docker-compose -f docker-compose.dev.yaml up --build || cleanup |
| postiz-frontend: | ||
| build: | ||
| context: . | ||
| dockerfile: Dockerfile.dev | ||
| target: devcontainer | ||
| container_name: postiz-frontend | ||
| restart: always | ||
| environment: | ||
| NEXT_PUBLIC_BACKEND_URL: "http://localhost:3000" | ||
| volumes: | ||
| - ./apps/frontend:/app | ||
| ports: | ||
| - 4200:4200 | ||
| networks: | ||
| - postiz-network |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add health check and resource limits to frontend service
The frontend service configuration needs similar improvements:
- Add health check
- Configure resource limits
postiz-frontend:
build:
context: .
dockerfile: Dockerfile.dev
target: devcontainer
container_name: postiz-frontend
restart: always
+ healthcheck:
+ test: ["CMD", "curl", "-f", "http://localhost:4200"]
+ interval: 30s
+ timeout: 10s
+ retries: 3
+ deploy:
+ resources:
+ limits:
+ cpus: '0.5'
+ memory: 512M
environment:
NEXT_PUBLIC_BACKEND_URL: "http://localhost:3000"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| postiz-frontend: | |
| build: | |
| context: . | |
| dockerfile: Dockerfile.dev | |
| target: devcontainer | |
| container_name: postiz-frontend | |
| restart: always | |
| environment: | |
| NEXT_PUBLIC_BACKEND_URL: "http://localhost:3000" | |
| volumes: | |
| - ./apps/frontend:/app | |
| ports: | |
| - 4200:4200 | |
| networks: | |
| - postiz-network | |
| postiz-frontend: | |
| build: | |
| context: . | |
| dockerfile: Dockerfile.dev | |
| target: devcontainer | |
| container_name: postiz-frontend | |
| restart: always | |
| healthcheck: | |
| test: ["CMD", "curl", "-f", "http://localhost:4200"] | |
| interval: 30s | |
| timeout: 10s | |
| retries: 3 | |
| deploy: | |
| resources: | |
| limits: | |
| cpus: '0.5' | |
| memory: 512M | |
| environment: | |
| NEXT_PUBLIC_BACKEND_URL: "http://localhost:3000" | |
| volumes: | |
| - ./apps/frontend:/app | |
| ports: | |
| - 4200:4200 | |
| networks: | |
| - postiz-network |
| postiz-backend: | ||
| build: | ||
| context: . | ||
| dockerfile: Dockerfile.dev | ||
| target: devcontainer | ||
| container_name: postiz-backend | ||
| restart: always | ||
| environment: | ||
| DATABASE_URL: "postgresql://postiz-local:postiz-local-pwd@postiz-postgres:5432/postiz-db-local" | ||
| REDIS_URL: "redis://postiz-redis:6379" | ||
| JWT_SECRET: "random string for your JWT secret, make it long" | ||
| FRONTEND_URL: "http://localhost:4200" | ||
| NEXT_PUBLIC_BACKEND_URL: "http://localhost:3000" | ||
| BACKEND_INTERNAL_URL: "http://localhost:3000" | ||
| volumes: | ||
| - ./apps/backend:/app | ||
| ports: | ||
| - 3000:3000 | ||
| networks: | ||
| - postiz-network |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance backend service configuration security and reliability
The backend service configuration needs improvements:
- Move sensitive environment variables to .env file
- Add health checks
- Configure resource limits
- Use secrets for sensitive data
postiz-backend:
build:
context: .
dockerfile: Dockerfile.dev
target: devcontainer
container_name: postiz-backend
restart: always
+ healthcheck:
+ test: ["CMD", "curl", "-f", "http://localhost:3000/health"]
+ interval: 30s
+ timeout: 10s
+ retries: 3
+ deploy:
+ resources:
+ limits:
+ cpus: '1'
+ memory: 1G
environment:
DATABASE_URL: "postgresql://postiz-local:postiz-local-pwd@postiz-postgres:5432/postiz-db-local"
REDIS_URL: "redis://postiz-redis:6379"
- JWT_SECRET: "random string for your JWT secret, make it long"
+ JWT_SECRET: ${JWT_SECRET}
FRONTEND_URL: "http://localhost:4200"
NEXT_PUBLIC_BACKEND_URL: "http://localhost:3000"
BACKEND_INTERNAL_URL: "http://localhost:3000"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| postiz-backend: | |
| build: | |
| context: . | |
| dockerfile: Dockerfile.dev | |
| target: devcontainer | |
| container_name: postiz-backend | |
| restart: always | |
| environment: | |
| DATABASE_URL: "postgresql://postiz-local:postiz-local-pwd@postiz-postgres:5432/postiz-db-local" | |
| REDIS_URL: "redis://postiz-redis:6379" | |
| JWT_SECRET: "random string for your JWT secret, make it long" | |
| FRONTEND_URL: "http://localhost:4200" | |
| NEXT_PUBLIC_BACKEND_URL: "http://localhost:3000" | |
| BACKEND_INTERNAL_URL: "http://localhost:3000" | |
| volumes: | |
| - ./apps/backend:/app | |
| ports: | |
| - 3000:3000 | |
| networks: | |
| - postiz-network | |
| postiz-backend: | |
| build: | |
| context: . | |
| dockerfile: Dockerfile.dev | |
| target: devcontainer | |
| container_name: postiz-backend | |
| restart: always | |
| healthcheck: | |
| test: ["CMD", "curl", "-f", "http://localhost:3000/health"] | |
| interval: 30s | |
| timeout: 10s | |
| retries: 3 | |
| deploy: | |
| resources: | |
| limits: | |
| cpus: '1' | |
| memory: 1G | |
| environment: | |
| DATABASE_URL: "postgresql://postiz-local:postiz-local-pwd@postiz-postgres:5432/postiz-db-local" | |
| REDIS_URL: "redis://postiz-redis:6379" | |
| JWT_SECRET: ${JWT_SECRET} | |
| FRONTEND_URL: "http://localhost:4200" | |
| NEXT_PUBLIC_BACKEND_URL: "http://localhost:3000" | |
| BACKEND_INTERNAL_URL: "http://localhost:3000" | |
| volumes: | |
| - ./apps/backend:/app | |
| ports: | |
| - 3000:3000 | |
| networks: | |
| - postiz-network |
|
Thank you @Ig0tU, please add an issue and explain everything behind this PR.
Should probably lives inside their provider. |
test autonomy
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements