Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml +semver:minor #648

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Owner

@guibranco guibranco commented Jan 17, 2025

πŸ“‘ Description

Delete .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml

βœ… Checks

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed

☒️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

  • Remove the snorkell-auto-documentation.yml workflow file.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed an automated documentation workflow from the GitHub Actions configuration.

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request removes the Snorkell auto-documentation workflow.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
The .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml workflow file was deleted, thus disabling the automatic documentation generation.
  • Deletion of the workflow file
.github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request involves the removal of a GitHub Actions workflow file .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml. This workflow was previously configured to automate documentation generation using an AI client on pushes to the main branch. The deletion suggests a change in the documentation generation strategy or a decision to discontinue the automated documentation process.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml Workflow file deleted; previously used Snorkell AI documentation client for automated documentation generation

Suggested labels

size/XS, β˜‘οΈ auto-merge

Suggested reviewers

  • gstraccini

Poem

🐰 Farewell, workflow of bytes and lines,
Documentation's AI design declines.
A silent delete, a workflow's last dance,
No more automated documentation's chance!
Hop along, code, your story untold. πŸ”


πŸ“œ Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 36af8d6 and 170ab61.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml (0 hunks)
πŸ’€ Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: SonarCloud Analysis
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Security Scan
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
  • GitHub Check: Deep Source Coverage report

πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 17, 2025
Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

  • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
  • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
  • Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
  • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
  • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

  • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
  • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings ​
Setting Value
Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count 10
Automatic PR Descriptions βœ…
Issue Categories ​
Category Enabled
Naming βœ…
Database Operations βœ…
Documentation βœ…
Logging βœ…
Error Handling βœ…
Systems and Environment βœ…
Objects and Data Structures βœ…
Readability and Maintainability βœ…
Asynchronous Processing βœ…
Design Patterns βœ…
Third-Party Libraries βœ…
Performance βœ…
Security βœ…
Functionality βœ…

Feedback and Support

Note

Korbit Pro is free for open source projects πŸŽ‰

Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here

@guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) January 17, 2025 10:23
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Consider removing the '[!NOTE]' block from the PR description since it appears to be a leftover placeholder.
  • This change might be more appropriate as a patch version bump (+semver:patch) rather than a minor version bump, since it's removing a documentation workflow rather than adding new features or breaking existing functionality.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟒 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟒 Security: all looks good
  • 🟒 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟒 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟒 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) label Jan 17, 2025
@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 17, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Infisical secrets check: βœ… No secrets leaked!

πŸ’» Scan logs
11:41AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
11:41AM INF 638 commits scanned.
11:41AM INF scan completed in 785ms
11:41AM INF no leaks found

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

❌ Build CrispyWaffle 9.1.221 failed (commit ebd5f84dc5 by @gstraccini[bot])

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

βœ… Build CrispyWaffle 9.1.223 completed (commit ebd5f84dc5 by @gstraccini[bot])

Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
Report missing for fbce6bc1 βœ… βˆ…
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (fbce6bc) Report Missing Report Missing Report Missing
Head commit (4e2b28b) 3681 1620 44.01%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#648) 0 0 βˆ… (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settingsΒ Β Β Β Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

Footnotes

  1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct. ↩

@guibranco guibranco merged commit d38bb21 into main Jan 17, 2025
30 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the guibranco-patch-1 branch January 17, 2025 17:02
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests βœ…

Project coverage is 40.62%. Comparing base (36af8d6) to head (4e2b28b).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #648   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   40.62%   40.62%           
=======================================
  Files          83       83           
  Lines        3631     3631           
  Branches      519      519           
=======================================
  Hits         1475     1475           
  Misses       2053     2053           
  Partials      103      103           

β˜” View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
πŸ“’ Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants