-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Delete .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml +semver:minor #648
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request removes the Snorkell auto-documentation workflow. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughThe pull request involves the removal of a GitHub Actions workflow file Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
π Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI π Files selected for processing (1)
π€ Files with no reviewable changes (1)
β° Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-review
on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-review
command in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-description
command in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolve
command in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a π or π on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
β
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions β Issue Categories
β
Category Enabled Naming β Database Operations β Documentation β Logging β Error Handling β Systems and Environment β Objects and Data Structures β Readability and Maintainability β Asynchronous Processing β Design Patterns β Third-Party Libraries β Performance β Security β Functionality β Feedback and Support
Note
Korbit Pro is free for open source projects π
Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider removing the '[!NOTE]' block from the PR description since it appears to be a leftover placeholder.
- This change might be more appropriate as a patch version bump (+semver:patch) rather than a minor version bump, since it's removing a documentation workflow rather than adding new features or breaking existing functionality.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- π’ General issues: all looks good
- π’ Security: all looks good
- π’ Testing: all looks good
- π’ Complexity: all looks good
- π’ Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click π or π on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
β Build CrispyWaffle 9.1.213 completed (commit 575270b873 by @guibranco) |
Infisical secrets check: β No secrets leaked! π» Scan logs11:41AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
11:41AM INF 638 commits scanned.
11:41AM INF scan completed in 785ms
11:41AM INF no leaks found
|
β Build CrispyWaffle 9.1.221 failed (commit ebd5f84dc5 by @gstraccini[bot]) |
β Build CrispyWaffle 9.1.223 completed (commit ebd5f84dc5 by @gstraccini[bot]) |
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settingsΒ Β Β Β Change summary preferencesCodacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more Footnotes
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests β
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #648 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 40.62% 40.62%
=======================================
Files 83 83
Lines 3631 3631
Branches 519 519
=======================================
Hits 1475 1475
Misses 2053 2053
Partials 103 103 β View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan. |
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
π Description
Delete .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml
β Checks
β’οΈ Does this introduce a breaking change?
Summary by Sourcery
CI:
snorkell-auto-documentation.yml
workflow file.Summary by CodeRabbit