Clarify Priority with Known+Unknown cards #1216
Conversation
|
I'll have ADrone take a look at this PR, since he was in charge of the last priority change/clarification |
|
I might be missing something - but you updated it to describe the opposite scenario of what the section is trying to explain. Sorry if I am reading it wrong -- but the point of that section is to let people know that playing an Unknown card instead of the known card, but you updated the section to describe playing a known card over an unknown card. |
|
There are two cases the original was trying to describe: when does playing an unknown over a known cause a PF and when does playing known over unknown cause a PF. In the first case that generally does nothing, and the second case is the important one to discuss, wherein the orig. doc was confusingly phrased The orig. doc was trying to say that the known has to have lower priority than all unknown superpositions but said it badly and reversed it |
|
additionally, according to the priority table, the original examples were invalid, so I changed them to reflect the current priority table |
|
hm, I can rephrase some of the wording, I think |
|
there we go, now it's all about whether the known has strictly lower priority than the unknown identities |
|
This PR is now obsolete after a discussion with ADrone; it reflected a common interpretation of the priority table which was not the intended meaning |
No description provided.