Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Derive on structs with generics #79
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Derive on structs with generics #79
Changes from 7 commits
503fa47
8c44e5b
453f7d9
f912e29
9e1c541
123ee67
c3cc057
62441df
dd67083
5f501fe
3071cf9
d6e3b12
3e489c5
fa2c3d2
853f418
d58ce82
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is it correct that adding a
PhantomData
here is only needed when generics are involved?if so, do you think it's possible (and practical) to not generate a
_phantom
field unless it's actually needed, just by looking atitem.generics
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should be possible, yes, but it would create additional conditions at the construction sites (there are 4 in this PR) and potentially any external derive macros. We could refactor those to use a common constructor method, but I figured I'd go for the approach that requires the least conditional code.
I'm fine either way, though.