Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

not use singleton and include the scripts together + run the JS call on server side #282

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 29, 2025

Conversation

vedhav
Copy link
Contributor

@vedhav vedhav commented Jan 29, 2025

No description provided.

@vedhav vedhav requested a review from llrs-roche January 29, 2025 15:09
@llrs-roche llrs-roche self-assigned this Jan 29, 2025
@vedhav vedhav enabled auto-merge (squash) January 29, 2025 15:11
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Unit Tests Summary

  1 files   11 suites   1m 27s ⏱️
122 tests 122 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
334 runs  334 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 7728d2f.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Unit Test Performance Difference

Test Suite $Status$ Time on main $±Time$ $±Tests$ $±Skipped$ $±Failures$ $±Errors$
plot_with_settings_ui 💚 $41.93$ $-1.18$ $0$ $0$ $+1$ $0$

Results for commit 1db7be0

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@vedhav vedhav force-pushed the use-singleton@main branch from 19980a8 to 7728d2f Compare January 29, 2025 16:41
@vedhav vedhav changed the title use singleton and include the scripts together not use singleton and include the scripts together + run the JS call on server side Jan 29, 2025
@vedhav vedhav merged commit 7f8267e into main Jan 29, 2025
25 checks passed
@vedhav vedhav deleted the use-singleton@main branch January 29, 2025 16:50
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 29, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants