Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Implementations list #1965

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

Update Implementations list #1965

merged 7 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

mishmosh
Copy link
Collaborator

@mishmosh mishmosh commented Dec 4, 2024

Describe your changes

  • Added Desktop Implementations section
  • Added Content-Addressed Data section
  • Removed "Tip" section
  • Moved elastic-ipfs to Inactive section

Files changed

implementations.md

What issue(s) does this address?

  • Updates the Implementations list to (1) reflect emerging group of data-only IPFS implementations and (2) status changes for some projects.

Does this update depend on any other PRs?

No

Checklist before requesting a review

  • Passing the beta version of the Check Markdown links for modified files check. Action results can be viewed here.

Checklist before merging

  • Passing all required checks (The beta Check Markdown links for modified files check is not required)

@mishmosh mishmosh requested review from 2color and lidel and removed request for 2color December 4, 2024 17:48

## Popular or Actively Maintained
For developers and operators.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if it makes sense to add an "IPFS Mainnet" column to indicate whether an implementation supports it.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mishmosh mishmosh Dec 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should address in a separate PR or issue. I think it would make sense as a bigger matrix of features/support, but not as the only one.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep. It's actually a matrix we need rather than Mainnet with the specifics

Copy link
Member

@2color 2color left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I’ve added a few comments, but overall, this is a helpful improvement in categorizing the implementations landscape.

@mishmosh
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@2color can you review again when you have a chance?

Copy link
Member

@2color 2color left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@2color 2color merged commit 40a51d4 into main Dec 19, 2024
4 checks passed
@2color 2color deleted the mishmosh-patch-1 branch December 19, 2024 15:02
@ipfs ipfs deleted a comment from Duonget123 Dec 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants