Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

assign unique id to each logical plan node #136

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2024

Conversation

jiangzhe
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 71.08434% with 24 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 70.99%. Comparing base (bbabfc2) to head (775ff90).

Files Patch % Lines
xngin-plan/src/explain.rs 40.00% 12 Missing ⚠️
xngin-plan/src/lgc/builder.rs 85.71% 4 Missing ⚠️
xngin-plan/src/lgc/op.rs 33.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
xngin-plan/src/lgc/reflect.rs 80.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
xngin-plan/src/rule/pred_move.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
xngin-plan/src/rule/assign_id.rs 93.75% 1 Missing ⚠️
xngin-plan/src/rule/derived_unfold.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #136   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   70.99%   70.99%           
=======================================
  Files         124      126    +2     
  Lines       15795    15798    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits        11213    11216    +3     
  Misses       4582     4582           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jiangzhe jiangzhe merged commit c77aab4 into main Apr 16, 2024
3 checks passed
@jiangzhe jiangzhe deleted the assign-id-to-logical-plan-node branch April 16, 2024 06:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants